期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG PET代谢参数对食管鳞癌放化疗效果的预测 被引量:1

Prognostic value of ^(18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by chemoradiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨氟-18脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射型计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET)对食管鳞癌放化疗效果的预测。方法 56例接受三维适形或调强放射治疗的食管鳞癌患者纳入研究,中位剂量60 Gy(54~60 Gy),放疗期间同步顺铂20 mg/m2每周1次+紫杉醇45 mg/m2每周1次,连续6周。放疗前行18F-FDG PET/CT扫描,分析FDG PET最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)、平均SUV摄取值(SUVmean)、肿瘤代谢体积(MTV)与总体生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)的相关性。Kaplan-Meier计算生存率,Cox模型分析预后影响因素。结果入组患者ⅡA期14例,ⅡB期6例,Ⅲ期36例,中位随访34.4个月(6~63个月),1、3、5年OS分别为83.5%、49.8%、19.5%,PFS分别为69.7%、16.9%、8.5%。肿瘤原发灶SUVmax中位数14.6(3.3~35.1),SUVmean中位数6.7(2.6~27.8),MTV中位数33.6 cm3(8.9~149.0 cm3)。SUVmax、SUVmean、MTV均与OS有关(χ2值4.712~11.272,P值0.001~0.049);SUVmax、SUVmean与PFS有关(χ2值分别为10.659、6.670,P值均为0.001)。Cox模型预后分析显示除TNM分期外,MTV是OS的预测指标(Wald=9.844,P=0.002),SUVmax是PFS的预测指标(Wald=9.649,P=0.002)。结论 18F-FDG PET代谢参数能够对食管鳞癌放化疗效果进行预测。 Objective To investigate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography(18F-FDG PET) for predicting overall survival(OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) treated with three-dimensional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods A total of 56 ESCC patients consecutively treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. Prescribed dose was 54-60 Gy with a median dose of 60 Gy. Six cycles of chemotherapy with Cisplatin 20 mg/m2 qw plus Paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 qw were administered concurrently. Each patient underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for simulation, PET-based metabolic parameters, including the maximum standard uptake value(SUVmax), mean SUV(SUVmean), and metabolic target volume(MTV) were calculated and correlated with OS and PFS, which calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox models were used to calculate the prognostic factors. Results The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was ⅡA in 14 cases, ⅡB in 6 cases, and Ⅲ in 36 cases. With a median following-up time 34.4 months(6-63 months), the OS and PFS at 1-, 3-, 5-year were 83.5%, 49.8%, 19.5%, and 69.7%, 16.9%, 8.5%, respectively. The median SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV was 14.6(3.3-35.1) cm3, 6.7(2.6-27.8) cm3, and 33.6(8.9-149.0) cm3, respectively. SUVmax, SUVmean and MTV showed correlation with OS(χ2=4.712-11.272, P=0.049-0.001), SUVmax and SUVmean was correlated with PFS(χ2=10.659, 6.670, P=0.001). Cox regression revealed MTV was a predictor for OS beside of TNM stage(Wald=9.844, P=0.002), while SUVmax was a predictor for PFS(Wald=9.649, P=0.002). Conclusion The metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET were prognostic factors for treatment outcome in patients with ESCC.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2016年第1期20-25,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 食管肿瘤 放射疗法 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 Esophageal neoplasms Radiotherapy Tomography emission-computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. Chemoradiotherapy oflocally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of aprospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation TherapyOncology Group[J]. JAMA, 1999, 281(17): 1623-1627.
  • 2Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (RadiationTherapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial ofcombined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versusstandard-dose radiation therapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(5):1167-1174.
  • 3Cohen DJ, Leichman L. Controversies in the treatment of local andlocally advanced gastric and esophageal cancers[J]. J Clin Oncol,2015, 33(16): 1754-1759.
  • 4Pedicini P, Caivano R, Fiorentino A, et al. Clinical radiobiology ofhead and neck cancer: the hypothesis of stem cell activation[J]. ClinTransl Oncol, 2015, 17(6): 469-476.
  • 5Park SB, Choi JY, Moon SH, et al. Prognostic value of volumetricmetabolic parameters measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucosepositronemission tomography/computed tomography in patients withsmall cell lung cancer[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2014, 14: 2.
  • 6Takeda A, Sanuki N, Fujii H, et al. Maximum standardized uptakevalue on FDG-PET is a strong predictor of overall and disease-freesurvival for non-small-cell lung cancer patients after stereotacticbody radiotherapy[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2014, 9(1): 65-73.
  • 7Moon SY, Joo KR, So YR, et al. Predictive value of maximumstandardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-FDG PET/CT inpatients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer[J].Clin Nucl Med, 2013, 38(10): 778-783.
  • 8Hwang JP, Lim I, Chang KJ, et al. Prognostic value of SUVmaxmeasured by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron EmissionTomography with Computed Tomography in Patients with PancreaticCancer[J]. Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2012, 46(3): 207-214.
  • 9Fukunaga T, Okazumi S, Koide Y, et al. Evaluation of esophagealcancers using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET[J]. J Nucl Med,1998, 39(6): 1002-1007.
  • 10Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, et al. Prognostic value of metabolictumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma[J]. AnnSurg Oncol, 2010, 17(1): 115-122.

二级参考文献15

  • 1蔡莉,高硕,李彦生,李大成,邢喜玲.^(18)F-FDG与^(11)C-MET PET显像在神经上皮性肿瘤术前分级中的价值及与Ki67相关性的比较[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(1):8-12. 被引量:10
  • 2郭洪波,于金明,张百江,杨国仁,付政,张为迪,黄勇,刘聿辉.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像对食管癌原发灶长度的测量[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(3):185-186. 被引量:6
  • 3Chung HW, Lee KH, Lee E J, et al. Comparison of uptake characteristics and prognostic value of ^201Tl and ^18F-FDG in esophageal cancer. World J Surg, 2008, 32 : 69-75.
  • 4Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002: 167-178.
  • 5Alexander BM, Othus M, Caglar HB, et al. Tumor volume is a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011, 79: 1381-1387.
  • 6Kato H, Nakajima M, Sohda M, et al. The clinical application of ^18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer. Cancer, 2009, 115 : 3196-3203.
  • 7Roedl JB, Colen RR, Holalkere NS, et al. Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus : response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET-CT. Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation. Radiother Oncol, 2008, 89: 278-286.
  • 8Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by ^18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010. 17: 115-122.
  • 9Mamede M, Abreu-E-Lima P, Oliva MR, et al. FDG PET/CT tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer: correlation with histopathology results. Am J Clin Oncol, 2007, 30: 377-388.
  • 10Choi JY, Jang HJ, Shim YM, et al. ^18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1843-1850.

共引文献6

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部