期刊文献+

种泥预处理方式对Anammox启动的影响 被引量:1

Influence of Seed Sludge Pretreatment Methods on the Start-up of Anammox Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对普通活性污泥进行硝化和反硝化预处理后富集Anammox菌。结果表明,硝化和反硝化预处理方式富集Anammox菌均耗时102 d。FISH技术分析表明,两者富集的微生物中均含Anammox菌。系统启动后(153~161 d),硝化和反硝化预处理方式的总氮平均负荷分别达到0.437 g/(g VSS·d)和0.309 g/(g VSS·d),总氮平均去除率分别达到71.4%和34.3%。可见对同一活性污泥进行硝化和反硝化预处理均可成功启动厌氧氨氧化过程,但硝化预处理更有利于厌氧氨氧化菌的富集。 Anammox bacteria were enriched from conventional activated sludges by nitrification and denitrification pretreatment. The results show that Anammox bacteria have been enriched from both the nitrified sludge and denitrified sludge after 102 days. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis(FISH) showed that the Anammox bacteria were exactly in the enriched sludge. The average total nitrogen(TN) loading rates of the Anammox systems from the nitrified sludge and denitrified sludge reached 0.437 g/(g VSS·d) and 0.309 g/(g VSS·d), respectively, during the period of 153~161 day, with the corresponding average TN removal rates up to 71.4% and 34.3%, respectively. The Anammox process can be start-up successfully from nitrified sludge and also denitrified sludge, but nitrification is more efficient pretreatment of seed sludge to enrich anammox bacteria.
出处 《环境科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期113-117,142,共6页 Environmental Science & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51208491) 福建省自然科学基金(2014J05067) 宁波市自然科学基金(201301A6107026)
关键词 厌氧氨氧化 硝化 反硝化 种泥预处理 Anammox nitrification denitrification seed sludge pretreatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈金声,史家梁,徐亚同.硝化速率测定和硝化细菌计数考察脱氮效果的应用[J].上海环境科学,1996,15(3):18-20. 被引量:50
  • 2国家环境保护总局,水和废水监测分析方法编委会编,魏复盛主编.水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 中国环境科学出版社, 2002
  • 3Tim L.G. Hendrickx,Yang Wang,Christel Kampman,Grietje Zeeman,Hardy Temmink,Cees J.N. Buisman.Autotrophic nitrogen removal from low strength waste water at low temperature[J].Water Research.2012(7)
  • 4Bin Ma,Shujun Zhang,Liang Zhang,Peng Yi,Junmin Wang,Shuying Wang,Yongzhen Peng.The feasibility of using a two-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal process to treat sewage[J].Bioresource Technology.2011(17)
  • 5Yu Tao,Da-Wen Gao,Yuan Fu,Wei-Min Wu,Nan-Qi Ren.Impact of reactor configuration on anammox process start-up: MBR versus SBR[J].Bioresource Technology.2011
  • 6Mathava Kumar,Jih-Gaw Lin.Co-existence of anammox and denitrification for simultaneous nitrogen and carbon removal—Strategies and issues[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials.2010(1)
  • 7A. Galí,J. Dosta,M.C.M. van Loosdrecht,J. Mata-Alvarez.Two ways to achieve an anammox influent from real reject water treatment at lab-scale: Partial SBR nitrification and SHARON process[J].Process Biochemistry.2006(4)
  • 8Ingo Schmidt,Olav Sliekers,Markus Schmid,Eberhard Bock,John Fuerst,J.Gijs Kuenen,Mike S.M. Jetten,Marc Strous.New concepts of microbial treatment processes for the nitrogen removal in wastewater[J].FEMS Microbiology Reviews.2003(4)
  • 9Mike S.M Jetten,Marc Strous,Katinka T van de Pas-Schoonen,Jos Schalk,Udo G.J.M van Dongen,Astrid A van de Graaf,Susanne Logemann,Gerard Muyzer,Mark C.M van Loosdrecht,J.Gijs Kuenen.The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium[J].FEMS Microbiology Reviews.1999(5)
  • 10M. Strous,J. J. Heijnen,J. G. Kuenen,M. S. M. Jetten.The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.1998(5)

共引文献36

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部