期刊文献+

P2P平台的约束机制选择及其模式演进 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究发现,P2P平台是根据耐心程度在匹配不同的约束机制。三种机制选择与配置的规律是:耐心充足和耐心匮乏的P2P平台会分别受到声誉约束和刑事制裁。耐心不足的P2P平台在行政监管启动之前,优先由私人纠纷解决机制在其约束范围内进行约束;在行政监管启动之后,优先由私人纠纷解决机制和诉讼制度的组合进行约束,一旦私人纠纷解决失效,则只能依靠诉讼制度。P2P平台约束模式的演进过程与行业发展阶段同步,是一个从自律走向他律、从单一走向混合的过程。我国应采取以行政监管为基础的混合约束模式。
作者 汪炜 郑扬扬
出处 《社会科学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期25-32,共8页 Social Science Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Davis K E, Gelpem A. Peer- to -Peer Financing for Development: Regulating the Intermediaries [J]. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 2009 -2010, (42) : 1209 -1268.
  • 2Verstein Andrew. Misregulation of Person -to - Person Lending [J]. The UCDL Review, 2011 (45) : 445.
  • 3Chaffee EC, Rapp GC. Regulating Online Peer - to - Peer Lending in the Aftermath of Dodd - Frank : In Search of an Evolving Regulatory Regime for an Evolving Industry [ J]1. Wash- ington & Lee Law Review, 2012 (69) : 485 -533.
  • 4吴晓光,曹一.论加强P2P网络借贷平台的监管[J].南方金融,2011(4):32-35. 被引量:193
  • 5宋鹏程,吴志国,赵京,Melissa Guzy.我国P2P借贷行业监管模式研究[J].南方金融,2014(1):16-20. 被引量:21
  • 6Woodruff C. Establishing Confidence in Business Partners: Court, Networks and Relationships as Pillars of Support [ R]. U- niversity of California, San Diego Working Paper, 2002.
  • 7Bakos, Dellarocas C. Cooperation without Enforcement? A Comparative Analysis of Litigation and Online Reputation as Quality Assurance Mechanisms [ C]. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems, 2002 : 127 - 142.
  • 8Ba- kos, Dellarocas C. Cooperation without Enforcement a Comparative Analysis of Litigation and Online Reputation as Quality Assurance Mechanisms [J]. Management Science, 2011, 57 (11): 1944- 1962.
  • 9张维迎,邓峰.信息、激励与连带责任——对中国古代连坐、保甲制度的法和经济学解释[J].中国社会科学,2003(3):99-112. 被引量:261
  • 10Pistor K, Xu C. Incomplete of Law--A Conceptual and Analytical Framework and Its Application to the Evolution of Financial Market Regulation [J]. Journal oflnternational Law and Politics, 2003, 35 (4) : 931 - 1013.

二级参考文献17

共引文献471

同被引文献59

  • 1周黎安,张维迎,顾全林,沈懿.信誉的价值:以网上拍卖交易为例[J].经济研究,2006,41(12):81-91. 被引量:151
  • 2诺思.2008.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.
  • 3诺思.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008:6.
  • 4KPMG and H2 Ventures (2015). FinTech 100: Leading Global FinTech Innovators Report 2015 [R]. http: //www. fintechinno- vators, eom/.
  • 5SEBI (2014). Consultation Paper on Crowdfunding in India. http: //www. sebi. gov. in/.
  • 6Klapper, L., A. Lusardi and P. Van Oudhcusden (2015). Financial Literacy Around the World: Insights from the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services Global Financial Literacy Survey [RJ. http: //www. mhfi. com/.
  • 7Aveni, T. (2015). New Insights Into An Evolving P2P Lending Industry: How Shifts in Roles and Risk are Shaping the Industry [R]. http: //www. planetfinancechina, org/.
  • 8零壹研究院.中国P2P网贷服务行业白皮书2015[M].北京:东方出版社,2015:165~239,265-304.
  • 9Laeven, L., R. Levine and S. Miehalopoulos (2015). Financial Innovation and Endogenous Growth. Journal of Financial Interrne- diation, 24 (1): 1-24,.
  • 10吴晓光,曹一.论加强P2P网络借贷平台的监管[J].南方金融,2011(4):32-35. 被引量:193

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部