摘要
目的探讨经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊术(TVT)、经闭孔无张力尿道吊带术(TOT)和单切口可调节Ajust^(TM)吊带治疗女性固有括约肌障碍型(ISD)压力性尿失禁(SUI)疗效及安全性。方法前瞻性随机对照法选取ISD型SUI患者80例(25例行TVT术、29例行TOT术、26例行Ajust^(TM)吊带术)。观察各组手术时间、术中及术后短、中期并发症发生情况并于术后6个月、1年对患者进行随访。结果 1TVT组手术时间最长(P=0.00),TOT组、Ajust组无显著差异(P>0.05);2TVT组术中耻骨后血肿1例、膀胱损伤1例,TOT组、Ajust组无术中并发症;3术后1年TVT组、Ajust组治愈率、有效率无显著差异(P>0.05),TOT组治愈率、有效率均较前两组低(P<0.05);4TVT组、Ajust组术后短期排尿障碍发生率较TOT组高(P<0.05),TVT组术后远期排尿障碍发生率显著高于其余两组(P<0.05);5TOT组、Ajust组术后1年最大尿流率(Qmax)、膀胱残余尿(PVR)与各组术后6个月指标相比无显著变化(P>0.05);TVT组术后1年Qmax降至(20.1±9.3)mL/s,PVR增至(5.6±8.2)mL,较其术后6个月有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论 TVT术和Ajust^(TM)吊带术治疗女性ISD型SUI疗效均满意。Ajust^(TM)吊带术有更加微创、安全的优势,远期疗效有待进一步随访。
Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape,tension-free obturator tape and Ajust^(TM)system for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence(SUI)with intrinsic sphincter deficiency(ISD).Methods The outcomes of 25 TVT,29 TOT and 26 Ajust^(TM) procedures for SUI were analyzed.The maximum flow rate(Qmax)and postvoid residual urine volume(PVR)before and after operation were collected to evaluate the patients' bladder function.Results 1The operation time was(30.8±5.9)min for TVT,which was longer than(21.1±4.3)min for TOT and(20.5±5.2)min for Ajust^(TM).The difference was significant(P=0.00).2In the TVT group,retropubic hematoma occurred in 1 case,and bladder injury occurred in1 case.In the TOT and Ajust^(TM)groups,no complications were observed.3The total cure rates of TVT and Ajust^(TM) were not significantly different(P〉0.05),but they were higher than the cure rate of TOT(P〈0.05).4TVT and Ajust^(TM)had higher incidence of short-term urination disorder than TOT(P〈0.05).TVT had higher longterm urination disorder than the other two groups(P〈0.05).5In the TOT group and Ajust^(TM)group,the Qmax and PVR did not change significantly 12 months after operation(P〉0.05).In the TVT group,the Qmax dropped from(24.0±7.7)mL/s 6months after operation to(20.1±9.93)mL/s 12 months after operation,while PVR increased from(3.3±6.7)mL to(5.6±8.2)mL(both P〈0.05).Conclusion TVT and Ajust^(TM) procedures are effective in the treatment of SUI with ISD,and Ajust^(TM)is safer,and minimally invasive,but the long-term efficacy still remains to be observed.
出处
《现代泌尿外科杂志》
CAS
2016年第2期135-138,共4页
Journal of Modern Urology