摘要
英国社会各界围绕"莱维森调查",就如何有效规制新闻业的行为问题开展了激烈的争论。经过公开讨论、跨党协商、议会辩论、枢密院司法委员会仲裁、女王御批等一系列程序,最终达成妥协方案,以"皇家特许状"的形式建立了对新闻业新的规制体系。这一案例充分展现了英国式协商民主的特点,其中不乏有益的启示和值得吸取的教训。
In the "Leves on Inquiry", the British community carried out intense debate on how to effectively regulate the behaviors of journalism. Through a series of procedures including open discussions, inter-party negotiations, parliamentary debates,the arbitration made by the Privy Council Judicial Committee, and approve by the Queen, a compromise has been reached and a New regulation system on the news industry in the form of "Royal Charter"was established.This case has fully demonstrated the characteristics of the British style deliberative democracy,which has useful inspiration and lessons can be learned.
出处
《理论与现代化》
CSSCI
2016年第1期64-73,共10页
Theory and Modernization
基金
教育部国家人权教育与培训基地重大项目"市场经济初创时期各国人权发展道路比较研究"
项目编号:12JJD820021
国家社科规划重点项目"公共领域冲突管理体制研究"
项目编号:13AGL005
关键词
莱维森调查
协商民主
英国
规制
新闻业
the "Leveson Inquiry"
deliberative democracy
Britain
regulation
journalism