期刊文献+

论人类遗传资源立法中的知情同意:现实困惑与变革路径 被引量:12

Informed Consent in the Legislation of Human Genetic Resources:The Realistic Perplex and Response Approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 后基因组时代,人类遗传资源成为生命科技领域创新性研究的资源基础。人类遗传资源的伦理与法律规范的特殊性可能在于"人"作为主体的自主决定权,以及"人与人类"的"社会/自然"属性的复杂性。这种特殊性在知情同意范畴内体现得尤为深刻。当"人"的自主决定权面对人类遗传资源的长效性和遗传性特征以及"人与人类"的"社会/自然"属性的复杂性时,便产生了个人同意、家庭同意与群体同意、概括同意与具体同意、本人同意与代理同意等实践难题。面对这些难题,在人类遗传资源立法的渐进变革中应保持法律规范与生命伦理规范间的张力,对知情同意在立法中适度规定。 In the post-genome era, the human genetic resources are the base of innovative research in the field of life science and technology. The particularity of human genetic resources in ethical and legal norm may lie in the discretionary power of "human" as the subject and the complexity of social and natural attribute of "human and mankind". This particularity is profoundly reflected in the scope of informed consent. When the discretionary power of "human" as the subject is confronted with the long residual action and hereditary of human genetic resources and the complexity of social and natural attribute of "human and mankind", challenge in practice between personal consent and proxy consent, family consent and group or community consent, broad consent and specific consent as well as informed consent and re-consent is thus emerging. The reasonable provision in human genetic resources-related legislation on informed consent should take into account both the human dignity and discretionary power and the particularity of human genetic resources and human social and natural attribute.
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期86-92,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(HUST:项目编号2015AE018)
关键词 人类遗传资源 生命伦理 知情同意 Human genetic resources Bioethics Informed consent
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Schroeder, D., Lucas, J. C. 'Benefit Sharing: From Biodiversity to Human Genetics--An Introduction' [A]. Schroeder, D., Lueas, J. C.(Eds) Benefit Sharing: From Biodiversity to Human Genetics[C]. Dordreeht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2013, 7-8.
  • 2Andrews, L. B. 'Harnessing the Benefits of Biobanks' [J]. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2005, 33(1): 22- 30.
  • 3Wolf, L. E. 'Advancing Research on Stored Biological Materials: Reconciling Law, Ethics, and Practice' [J]. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2010, 11(1): 118-126.
  • 4Hansson, M. G., Dillner, J., Bartram, C. R., Carlson, J. A., Helgesson, G. 'Should Donors Be Allowed to Give Broad Consent to Future Biobank Research?' [J]. LancetOncology, 2006, 7(3): 269.
  • 5Knoppers, B. M. 'Consent Revisited: Points to Consider' [J]. Health Law Review, 2005, 13(2&3): 35.
  • 6Arnason,V. 'Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland' [J]. Bioethics, 2004, 18(1): 27- 49.
  • 7Helgesson, G. 'In Defense of Broad Consent'[J]. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2012, 21(1): 40-50.
  • 8Caulfield, T., Kaye, J. 'Broad Consent in Biobanking: Reflections on Seemingly Insurmountable Dilemmas' [J]. Medical Law International, 2009, 10(2): 85- 100.
  • 9'UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Framework, Version3.0 (October, 2007)'. http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2011/05/EGF20082.pdf.
  • 10Tass6, A. M., Budin-Ljosne, I., Knoppers, B. M., Harris, J. R. 'Retrospective Access to Data: the ENGAGE Consent Experience' [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2010, 18(7): 741-745.

二级参考文献16

  • 1黄新华.哈贝马斯的科学技术意识形态论述评[J].马克思主义研究,1999(1):66-70. 被引量:8
  • 2冈特·绍伊博尔德.《海德格尔分析新时代的科技》[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993年.第195页.
  • 3庞德.《通过法律的社会控制》,沈宗灵,董世忠译.北京:商务印书馆,1984年,第131页.
  • 4张振明.《法兰克福学派与科学技术哲学》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992年,第51页.
  • 5华勒斯坦.《科学·知识·权力》,刘健芝译.北京:三联书店、牛津大学出版社,1999年,第1页.
  • 6马丁·海德格尔.《林中路》,孙周兴译.上海:上海译文出版社,1997年,第112页.
  • 7南北圆桌会议秘书处.《信息技术革命和发展中国家》,《全球学研究与展望》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,1997年,第162页.
  • 8约翰·杜威.《确定性的寻求——关于知行关系的研究》,傅统先译.上海:上海人民出版社,2004年,第199页.
  • 9赫伯特·马尔库塞.《现代文明与人的困境——马尔库塞文集》,李小兵译.上海:上海三联书店,1989年,第108页.
  • 10斯厅巴尼.《民法大全选译:正义和法》,黄风译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992年,第34页.

同被引文献94

引证文献12

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部