期刊文献+

还原论论争及形相解析 被引量:2

An Analysis on Debates and Forms of Reductionism
原文传递
导出
摘要 还原论的表现形式是不同的,如果没有明确的区分就会对还原论产生误解。深入剖析有关还原论的论争,可以将其分为本质层面、本体论层面、认识论层面、方法论层面四种形相。这种区分有利于界定与澄清有关还原论的诸多解释。对待还原论,首先需要认识到微观还原与宏观还原的匹配,其次在本体论上树立时空观念,认识论上建立简单性和生成性信念,方法论上确立整合原则,最后强调方法论与本体论、认识论的非同构性关系。 The forms of reductionism are different. There will be a misunderstanding on reductionism if no clear distinction is made. An in-depth analysis of the debate shows that it can be divided into four forms in ontological, epistemological, methodological and fundamental level. This article stresses that, when using the term of reductionism, we need to realize the relation of the micro-reduction and macro-reduction, then set up the conception of time and space in ontology, hold the faith on simplicity and generative in epistemology, and establish integration principle in methodology. Finally, we shall not forget the non-homogeneity on ontology, epistemology, and methodology.
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期155-160,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金项目"当代整体论‘整体与部分’思想的梳理与整合研究"(项目编号:11CZX018)
关键词 还原论 批判 类型 形相 Reductionism Debate Classification Forms
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Agazzi, E. The Problem of Reduction in Science [M]. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publicshers, 1991, Viii.
  • 2威拉德·蒯因.从逻辑的观点看[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987..
  • 3Nagel, E. The Meaning of Reduction in the Natural Sciences [M]. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1949, 99-135.
  • 4Kemeny, J., Oppenheim, P. 'On Reduction' [J] . Philosophical Studies, 1956, 7: 6-19.
  • 5Oppenheim, P., Putnam, H. Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis [M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1958, 3-36.
  • 6[美]欧内斯特·内格尔.科学的结构[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2002.278.
  • 7Feyerabend, P. K. 'Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism' [J]. Minnesota Studiesin the Philosophy of Science, 1962, 3: 28-97.
  • 8Kim, J. Mind in a Physical World[M]. Cambridge: MITPress, 1998, 92-97.
  • 9Jones, R. H. Reduction:Analysis and the Fullness of Reality [MI. London: Associated University Press, 2000, 24.
  • 10Peacocke, A. Reductionism in Academic Disciplines [M]. Guildford: SRHE & NFER-NELSON: 1985, 9-16.

二级参考文献21

  • 1埃德加·莫兰.复杂思想:自觉的科学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.137.
  • 2尼古拉斯·布宁 余纪元.西方哲学英汉对照辞典[M].北京:人民出版社,2001..
  • 3李建会.与真理为友[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002..
  • 4笛卡尔.谈谈方法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000..
  • 5欧阳莹之.复杂系统理论基础[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002..
  • 6培根 许宝睽译.新工具[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997..
  • 7黑格尔.哲学史讲演录[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959..
  • 8罗宾·柯林伍德.自然的观念[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
  • 9埃米尔.迪尔凯姆.社会学方法的规则[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.118.
  • 10Helga Nowotny.The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction- Emergent interfaces between the natural science, humanities and social sciences [J].Theory, culture & Society. 2005. vol.22(5)15:31

共引文献101

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部