摘要
国外学者在对中国梦的解读中形成了认知分歧。关于中国梦的内涵认知,表现为"国家梦"与"个人梦"的分歧;关于中国梦提出的动机认知,表现为"民族复兴"与"霸权主义"的分歧;关于中国梦与其他国家梦的关系认知,表现为"梦想相通"与"梦想不相容"的分歧;关于中国梦的道路选择认知,表现为"和平发展"与"对外扩张"的分歧;关于中国梦的前景认知,表现为"充满信心"与"不切实际"的分歧。梳理并分析国外学者解读中国梦的视角及其观点,有助于澄清其中的偏见与误读,还原中国梦本质思想。
Foreign scholars produced the cognitive difference in the interpretation of the Chinese dream. Their cognitive difference is expressed as the "national dream" and "individual dream" with respect to the connotation of the Chinese dream. As for the presentation motivation of the Chinese dream, their cognitive difference is expressed as the "national revival" and "hegemonism". In terms of the relation between the Chinese dream and other nations' dream, their cognitive difference is expressed as the "interlinked dream" and "incompatible dream". In the path selection of the Chinese dream, their cognitive difference is expressed as the "peaceful development" and "outward expansion". As for the prospect of the Chinese dream, their cognitive difference is expressed as "be full of confidence" and "impractical". The purpose of this paper is to arrange and analyze the perspectives and views in which foreign scholars' interpretation of the Chinese dream,to clarify the prejudice and misunderstanding, as well as to restore the original implication of the Chinese dream.
出处
《社会主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期161-167,共7页
Socialism Studies
基金
2013年度国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国梦理论与实践研究"(13&ZD005)
关键词
中国梦
国际反响
认知分歧
Chinese Dream
International Echo
Cognitive Difference