期刊文献+

临床实验室分析质量目标的共识(下) 被引量:5

Consensus on the analysis quality goal of clinical laboratories(Ⅱ)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了确保临床实验室的检测质量,满足患者和临床医师对临床实验室的要求,临床实验室的专家们长期以来一直致力于研究、探索、建立分析性能质量指标(简称质量指标)。1999年,斯德哥尔摩会议确定了质量指标的5个等级。2014年,欧洲检验医学联合会(EFLM)在意大利米兰召开了第2次国际会议。该会议对斯德哥尔摩会议的声明重新进行了审核,将原先确定的质量指标的5个等级简化为3个,并提出了其他提议。 In order to ensure the determination quality in clinical laboratories and meet the requirements of patients and clinicians, experts had been dedicated to establishing analysis performance specifications for a long time. In 1999, 5 grades for quality indicators were identified at the Stockholm consensus conference. In 2014, the second meeting of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine(EFLM) was opened in Milan,Italy,and the consensus statement on the Stockholm consensus conference was modified. The original classification(5 grades) was simplified into 3 grades.
作者 冯仁丰
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2016年第2期83-86,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 分析性能质量指标 临床后果 生物变异 操作水平 Analytical performance quality indicator Clinical outcome Biological variation Operation level
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1PANTEGHINI S, SANDBERG S. Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 (6) : 829-832.
  • 2KALLNER A, MCQUEEN M, HEUCK C. The Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine, 25-26 April 1999[J]. Stand J Clin Lab Invest, 1999, 59 ( 7 ) : 475-476.
  • 3FRASER CG. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 837-840.
  • 4HORVATH AR, BOSSUYT PM, SANDBERG S, et al. Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies- is it possible[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 841-848.
  • 5THUE G, SANDBERG S. Analytical performance specifications based on how clinicians use laboratory tests. Experiences from a post-analytical external quality assessment programme[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 857-862.
  • 6RIC6S C, ALVAREZ V, PERICH C, et al. Rationale for using data on biological variation[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 863-870.
  • 7CAROBENE A. Reliability of biological variation data available in an online database: need for improvement[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 871-877.
  • 8BARTLETT WA, BRAGA F, CAROBENE A, et al. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 879-885.
  • 9HAECKEL R, WOSNIOK W, STREICHERTT. Optimizing the use of the "state-of-the-art" performance criteria[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 887-891.
  • 10ORTH M. Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable? - The German point of view[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53 ( 6 ) : 893-898.

同被引文献26

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部