摘要
在柏拉图的《申辩》中,苏格拉底被控不信奉雅典所信奉的神,却信奉别的新的精灵,但是《申辩》没有明确说明苏格拉底所信奉的新的精灵究竟是什么。为了探究在《申辩》中,"精灵"一词的含义,本文考察了该对话中与其相近的词汇,比如"神"和"精灵般事物"之间的关系。本文试图证明苏格拉底确实信奉新的精灵,因而犯有不敬神之罪,同时新的精灵不是一个,而是两个。此外,本文也试图说明苏格拉底对不敬神的指控而做出的辩护是无力的。
In Plato's Apology,Socrates was guilty of not believing in gods in whom the Athens believes,but in new. However,the Apology does not make clear what the new mean. In order to investigate the exact meaning of, this article studies the words,,,, and δαιμóνιον in the Apology and proves that Socrates did believe in new which is not one,but two. Moreover,this article will also illustrate that Socrates' defence for his accusation on religion is weak.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期83-90,161,共8页
World Philosophy
