期刊文献+

列斯特评估量表及其在全科医生应诊能力评价中的应用 被引量:22

Leicester Assessment Package and Its Application in the Assessment of the Consultation Ability of General Practitioners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全科医生是综合程度较高的医学人才,主要在基层承担预防保健、常见病/多发病的诊疗和转诊、康复及慢性病长期管理、健康管理等多维一体化服务。全科医生应诊能力的不断改进是提高全科医疗服务质量的保障,也是全科医生必备的"看家本领"。在全科医生培训中,用于评价其应诊能力和全科医学思维能力的工具很多。本文在复习文献的基础上,介绍列斯特评估量表(LAP)及其在国外全科医生应诊能力评价中的应用和经验,为建立适合我国国情的、客观的、科学的全科医生应诊能力评价体系提供借鉴。 General practitioners are medical talents with high degree of comprehensive ability,who are mainly responsible for the multidimensional integration services at the grassroots level including disease prevention and health care,diagnosis,treatment and referral of common and frequently occurring disease, rehabilitation, chronic disease long-term management and health management. The continuous improvement of the consultation skills of the general practitioners is the guarantee of the service quality,and also the " one' s special skill" of the general practitioners. In the progress of the general practitioner training,there are many instruments used to evaluate the consultation skills and the family medicine thinking ability. The current study aims to introduce the Leicester Assessment Package and the application and experience in the assessment of the consultation skills in the foreign countries based on literature review,and to provide reference for the establishment of the consultation skills assessment system of the general practitioners which is objective,scientific and suitable for China' s national conditions.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期447-450,共4页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 列斯特评估量表 全科医生 应诊能力 评价 Leicester assessment package General practitioners Consultation skills Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Jiwa M, Mckinley R, O'Shea C, et al. Investigating the impact of extraneous, distractions on consultations in general practice: lessons learned [ J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2009, 9 (1) : 8.
  • 2Weingarten MA, Yaphe J, Blumenthal D, et al. A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient - centredness in family physicians' consultations [ J ]. Patient Educ Couns, 2001, d5 (2): 107-110.
  • 3陈丽芬,路孝琴.全科医师临床能力的评价体系[J].中华全科医师杂志,2014,13(8):617-619. 被引量:17
  • 4Schirmer JM, Mauksch L, Lang F, et al. Assessing communication competence: a review of current tools [J]. Faro Med, 2005, 37 (3): 184-192.
  • 5Fraser RC, Mckinley RK, Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package [J]. BrJ Gen Pract, 1994, 44 (384) : 293 -296.
  • 6Fraser RC. Assessment of consultation competence. The leicester assessment package [ M ]. Macclesfield : Glaxo Medical Fellowship, 1994.
  • 7Hastings A, McKinley RK, Fraser RC. Strengths and weaknesses in the consultation skills of senior medical students: identification, enhancement and curricular change [ J ]. Med Educ, 2006, 40 (5) : 437 -443.
  • 8Redsell SA, Hastings AM, Cheater FM, et al. Devising and establishing the face and content validity of explicit criteria of consultation competence in UK primary care nurses [ J ]. Nurse Education Today, 2003, 23 (4): 299-306.
  • 9Jiwa M, O'Shea C, Merriman G, et al. Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures [ J ]. Qual Prim Care, 2010, 18 (4) : 243 - 250.
  • 10Boon H, Stewart M. Patient -physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review [J]. Patient Educ Couns, 1998, 35 (3): 161-176.

二级参考文献7

共引文献16

同被引文献188

引证文献22

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部