期刊文献+

基于利益相关方满意程度的创新项目全面集成评估模型与评估方法 被引量:5

Fully Integrated Evaluation Model and Approach of Innovation Projects Based on the Satisfaction of Stakeholders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在整合项目利益相关方主观评价与项目过程客观要素基础上,提出基于利益相关方满意程度的创新项目集成评估模型,并在前景理论指导下通过采用模糊集方法解决多利益相关方在共同决策过程中的满意程度测量问题,进而提出基于利益相关方满意程度的创新项目集成方法。通过对项目利益相关方的主观项目评价结果进行科学量化,并提出创新项目跟踪评估的模型和方法,将有助于提升创新项目跟踪决策与变更管理的科学性和有效性。 On the basis of the integration of stakeholders' subjective evaluation and objective elements,this paper presents an integrated innovation project evaluation model based on satisfaction of stakeholders,and use both prospect theory and fuzzy sets to solve the satisfaction measurement problem in the co-decision making process with multi-stakeholder involved,and then an innovation project integration method based on satisfaction of stakeholders is proposed.The major contribution of this research lies in the quantitative analysis of stakeholders' subjective evaluation and the structured method for project tracking evaluation,which makes the tracking decision-making and sequential changes in innovation project more scientific,efficient,and consistent.
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期432-439,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20130001110036) 天津市政府决策咨询重点资助项目(ZFZX2012-41)
关键词 创新项目 项目利益相关方 项目利益相关方满意程度 满意度评价 模糊评价方法 innovative projects project stakeholders project stakeholder satisfaction satisfaction evaluation fuzzy evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1万钢.大力推动大众创业万众创新 形成全社会支持和参与创新的良好局面[J].中国科技产业,2014(12):8-9. 被引量:13
  • 2徐光,白明莹,田也壮,杨洋.基于网络层次分析法的技术创新项目评估体系研究[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(3):40-43. 被引量:10
  • 3ROZENES S, VITNER G, SPRAGGETT S. MPCS: Multidimensional Project Control System[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22(2) :109~118.
  • 4PAJARES J, LOPEZ-PAREDES A. An Extension of the EVM Analysis for Project Monitoring: The Cost Control Index and the Schedule Control Index[J]. In ternational Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29 (5) :615--621.
  • 5VANHOUCKE M. Measuring the Efficiency of Pro- ject Control Using Fictitious and Empirical Project Data[J]. International Journal of Project Manage- ment, 2012, 30(2): 252~263.
  • 6GARDINER P D, STEWART K. Revisiting the Golden Triangle of Cost, Time and Quality: The Role of NPV in Project Control, Success and Failure[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2000, 18(4): 251~256.
  • 7ROZENES S, VITNER G, SPRAGGETT S. MPCS: Multidimensional Project Control System[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22(2) : 109~118.
  • 8YOUNG M, CONBOY K. Contemporary Project Portfolio Management: Reflections on the Develop- ment of an Australian Competency Standard for Pro- ject Portfolio Management[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2013, 31(8) : 1 089~1 100.
  • 9RABBANI M, BAJESTANI M A, KHOSHKHOU G B. A Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Project Selection Problem [J]. Expert Systems with AoDlieations,2010,37(1) ,315~321.
  • 10HIENERTH C, LETTL C, KEINZ P. Synergies a mong Producer Firms, Lead Users, and User Com munities: The Case of the LEGO Producer-User E cosystem[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Man agement, 2014,31(4): 848~866.

二级参考文献17

共引文献58

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部