期刊文献+

国内外UGC质量研究现状与展望 被引量:24

Research State and Prospect of UGC Quality at Home and Abroad
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从UGC存在的质量问题、UGC的质量评价、UGC的质量控制这3个方面梳理了国内外UGC质量研究的主要成果,并对相关成果进行评述,指出现有研究取得的成果和存在的问题,并对未来研究应当关注的问题进行展望。认为,在研究对象上,应当关注移动UGC、非文本型UGC的质量评价与控制;在研究视角上,要关注用户行为、UGC语义内容、UGC质量三者之间的关联;在研究方法上,要融合用户研究、行为科学、信息质量、数据质量管理、大数据分析等相关理论和方法。 This paper introduces and reviews the main research achievements of user-generated content (UGC) quality at home and abroad from 3 aspects, including quality problems, quality evaluation and quality control. Then, the paper points out the research achievements and existing problems, and proposes the prospect for the concerned issue of future research. The paper be- lieves that the attention should be paid for the quality evaluation and control of mobile UGC and non-text UGC based on the research object. Based on the research method, the paper believes that it is necessary to integrate related theories and methods, such as user research, behavior science, information quality, data quality control and big data analysis.
作者 金燕
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期15-19,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于用户行为挖掘的UGC质量实时预判与控制机制研究"的成果之一 项目编号:15BTQ064
关键词 用户生成内容 质量评价 质量控制 研究现状 展望 user-generated content quality evaluation quality control research status prospect
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1VICKERY G, WUNSCH-VINCENT S. Participative web and us- er-created content: Web 2.0 wikis and social networking [ M]. [ S. 1.] : Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop-ment (OECD), 2007.
  • 2杨善林,王佳佳,代宝,李旭军,姜元春,刘业政.在线社交网络用户行为研究现状与展望[J].中国科学院院刊,2015,30(2):200-215. 被引量:70
  • 3SCHNEIDER J, POBOCIK R S. Credibility and quality of breasffeeding information from YouTube videos : a content analy- sis [ J ]. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2013, 113 (9): A90.
  • 4ANDERKA M, et al. Towards automatic auality assurance in Wikipedia [ C]. World Wide Web Conference Series, Hydera- bad, India. 2011 : 5-6.
  • 5HAVATI P, et al. Definition of spam 2.0 : new spamming boom [ C ] //Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. 2010 : 580-584.
  • 6DEWAN P, KUMARAGURU P. It doesn' t break just on Twit- ter. Characterizing facebook content during real world events [J]. arXiv: 1405.4820vl [cs. SI, 2014: 1-14.
  • 7ANDRIP, et al. Who gives a Tweet? Evaluating microblog con- tent value [ C] //Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Seattle: ACM Press, 2012 : 471-474.
  • 8ANDERKA M, et al. Predicting quality flaws in user-generated content: the case of Wikipedia [ C] //Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Develop- ment in Information Retrieval. ACM, 2012: 981-990.
  • 9聂卉.基于内容分析的用户评论质量的评价与预测[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(13):83-89. 被引量:20
  • 10林煜明,王晓玲,朱涛,周傲英.用户评论的质量检测与控制研究综述[J].软件学报,2014,25(3):506-527. 被引量:48

二级参考文献290

共引文献264

同被引文献256

引证文献24

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部