中国研究型大学科研生产率的动态分析——基于DEA-Malmquist指数的分解被引量：11

Dynamic Analysis on Research Productivity of China's Research Universities Based on DEA-Malmquist Index

下载PDF

导出

摘要利用67所研究型大学的相关数据,结合DEA-Malmquist指数方法,对我国研究型大学科研生产率作动态分析研究发现:2003-2011年,我国研究型大学科研投入和产出增长速度较快,其中科研产出的增长速度快于科研投入增长的速度;在科研生产中,技术效率的提高快于技术创新;而在科研效率构成要素方面,则存在规模不经济现象和规模要素对生产率的贡献最小的特点。 The research productivity of the universities are dynamically analyzed by using relevant data of 67 research universities by means of DEA-Malmquist index. Empirical research finds out that both input and output of those universities research enjoyed fast growth from 2003 to 2011 and the input was even faster, the universities＇ effieiency grew faster than technological innovation in research production while diseconomies of scale still existed.

作者潘健宗晓华

机构地区南京大学

出处《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期37-42,共6页 Modern Education Management

基金江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划重点资助项目"研究型大学技术转移机制与激励政策研究--比较创新体制的视角"(B-a/2011/01/019)

关键词研究型大学科研生产率 DEA-MALMQUIST research universities research productivity DEA-Malmquist

分类号 G644 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1Malmquist S. Index Numbers and Indifference surfaces[J]. Trabajos De Estadistica, 1953,4 (2) : 209- 242.
2Fare R,Grosskopf S. Productivity Growth,Tech- nical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84( 1 ): 66-83.
3Pastor J T, Ruiz J L, Sirvent I. A Statistical Test for Detecting Influential Observations in DEA [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,115 ( 3 ) : 542-554.
4陈艾华,吴伟.研究型大学跨学科科研生产力提升:资源扫描及践行路径[J].现代教育管理,2015(10):45-52. 被引量：3

二级参考文献22

1冯钢.跨学科研究何以可能?[J].浙江社会科学,2007(4):18-19. 被引量：17
2Kassarjian, H. H. Content Analysis in Consumer Research[J]. The Journal of Consumer Research, 1977,4, (1):8-18.
3Ormerod, R. J. Is content analysis either prac- tical or desirable for research evaluation? [J]. The In- ternational Journal of Management Science,2000,28 (2) : 241-245.
4Insch, G. S. , Moore, J. E. , & Murphy, L. D. Content analysis in leadership research:examples, pro- cedures, and suggestions for future use [J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1997,8( 1 ) : 1-25.
5Bos,W. ,& Tarnai,C. Content analysis in empirical social research [ J ]. International Journal of E- ducational Research, 1999,31 ( 8 ) : 659-671.
6JBordage, G. , Foley, R. , Goldyn, S. Skills and attributes of directors of educational programmes [ J]. Medical Education, 2000,34( 3 ) : 206-210.
7Amey, M. J. , & Brown, D. F. Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Academic Work: A Case Study of a U-niversity-Community Partnership [ J ]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2005, (102) :23-35.
8Benner, M. , Sandstr?m, U. Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System [ J ]. Research Policy, 2000,29 ( 2 ) : 291-301.
9Gulbrandsen, M. , & Smeby, J. -C. Industry funding and university professors' research perfor- mance [ J ]- Research Policy, 2005,34 ( 6 ) 932-950.
10Robertson, D. W. , Martin, D. K. , & Singer, P. A. Interdisciplinary Research:Putting the Methods un- der the Microscope [ J ]. BMC Medical Research Method- ology, 2003,3(20) : 1-5.