期刊文献+

自然类、物种与动力学系统 被引量:5

Natural Kinds, Biological Species, and Dynamical System
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于生物物种的本体论地位存在两种主要观点:传统观点认为物种是拥有本质的自然类,另一种替代观点认为物种是没有本质的个体。传统观点的困难是本质主义与进化论不相容,但这并不能成为物种个体论的理由。混杂实在论和自我平衡属性簇理论主张自然类的一种非本质主义解释,物种仍然可以看做典型的自然类,但是这种进路同样面临不少困难。本文试图提出生物物种的一种动力学系统理论进路,也即把物种视作动力学系统状态空间中的吸引子,进而将这种进路扩展为自然类的一种新本质主义解释。 There are two main views about the ontological status of biological species. Traditional view thinks that species are natural kinds with essence, while an alternative view claims that species are individuals without essence. The difficulty of traditional view is that essentialism is incon-sistent with evolutionary theory, which is not the reason for species-as-individuals, however. Promiscuous Realism and HPC theory hold a non-essen-tialist account of natural kinds. According to them, species could still be considered as typical natural kinds, but this non-essentialist approach to species and natural kinds faces many difficulties too. This paper attempts to purpose a dynamical system theoretical account of biological species,which takes species as attractors in state space of a dynamical system. If it is successful, this approach can be extended to be a new essentialist ac-count of natural kinds.
作者 陈明益
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期100-104,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 自然类 本质 物种 动力学系统 吸引子 natural kinds essence species dynamical system attractor
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kripke.S.Naming and Necessity[M].Basil Blackwell,1972.
  • 2Putnam,H.Is Semantics Possible?[C]//Putnam,H.Mind,Language and Reality:Philosophical Papers,vol.2.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1975:139-152.
  • 3Hull,D.A Matter of Individuality[J].Philosophy of Science,1978,45(3):335-360.
  • 4Dupre,J.The Disorder of Things:Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science[M].Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1993.
  • 5Boyd,R.Homeostasis,Species and Higher Taxa[C]//Species:New Interdisciplinary Essays.edited by Robert A.Wilson.Massachusetts:The MIT Press,1999:141-186.
  • 6Magnus,P.D.NK≠HPC[J].The Philosophical Quarterly,2014,64:471-477.
  • 7Reydon,T.A.C.How to Fix Kind Membership:A Problem for HPC Theory and a Solution[J].Philosophy of Science,2009,76:724-736.
  • 8Wilkerson,T.E.Natural Kinds[M].Aldershot:Avebury,1995.
  • 9Ereshefsky,M.What’s Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism[J].Philosophy of Science,2010,77(5):674-685.
  • 10Yoshimi,J.Supervenience,Dynamical Systems Theory,and Non-Reductive Physicalism[J].British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,2012,63:373-398.

同被引文献24

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部