期刊文献+

Weibull分布下操作风险监管的遗漏风险特征 被引量:1

Omitted Risks in Supervising Operational Risk under the Weibull Distribution
原文传递
导出
摘要 操作风险度量结果存在显著不确定性,若以点估计值来要求监管资本,必然产生风险监管遗漏问题。为此,本文在Weibull分布下通过分析操作风险监管资本度量误差变动规律,探寻监管遗漏风险变动的特征:随操作风险递增,在尺度参数影响下,监管遗漏风险暴露程度增大,在形状参数和频数参数影响下,监管遗漏风险变动趋势呈现出显著不确定性,且存在多个极值风险状态点。当操作风险趋近于极值状态时,监管遗漏风险会趋于无穷大。可见,必须为监管遗漏风险要求监管资本,将监管资本点估计值要求方式改革为缓冲性要求方式。本研究对于解决类似次贷危机的风险监管遗漏问题是一种有益的尝试。 The measurements of operational risk is remarkably uncertain,therefore,if the regulatory capital is required based on the point estimates,there must be omitted risks in the regulation. Considering this,the paper theoretically explored the change laws of the operational risk's measurement error in the Weibull distribution to seek the characteristic of the omitted risk's change. The results show that,as the operational risk increases,the omitted risk exposure in regulation will increases under the influence of scale parameter; whereas under the influence of shape parameter and frequency parameter,the changing trend of the omitted risk displays remarkable uncertainty and multiple extreme risk state points exist. As the operational risk approaches the extreme status,the omitted risk in the regulation goes to infinity.This implies that,it is necessary to require regulatory capital for the omitted risk in regulation and the regulatory capital requirement mode based on point estimates should be reformed into the buffering requirement mode. This study is a promising attempt to solve the problems of the omitted risks like the subprime crisis.
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期24-35,共12页 Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金"度量模型与管理模型整合下的操作风险管理最优边界研究"(项目编号:71171167) 国家自然科学基金"操作风险动态量化方法研究--从微观机构到宏观系统"(项目编号:71501117) 国家自然科学基金"基于Copula理论的高频数据间非线性相关结构建模与应用研究"(项目编号:71301130) 国家社科基金重大项目"防范系统性风险和区域性金融风险研究--基于金融适度分权的视角"(项目编号:13&ZD030)
关键词 操作风险 监管 遣漏风险 缓冲资本 Operational Risk Supervision Omitted Risk Buffering Capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Basel Committee on Banking Supervision,2004,“International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards:A Revised Framework",Bank for International Settlements.
  • 2Mignola,G.and R.Ugoccioni,2006,“Sources of uncertainty in modelling operational risk losses",The Journal of Operational Risk,1(2):33-50.
  • 3King,J.L.,2001,“Operational Risk:Measurement and Modelling",New York:John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.
  • 4Gourier,E.,W.Farkas and D.Abbate,2009,“Operational risk quantification using extreme value theory and copulas:from theory to practice",The Journal of Operational Risk,4(3):3-26.
  • 5Fengge,Y.,W Hongmei and L Jiaqi,2013,“CVaR measurement and operational risk management in commercial banks according to the peak value method of extreme value theory",Mathematical and Computer Modelling,58(1-2):15-27.
  • 6Dionne,G.and H.Dahen,2008,“What about Underevaluating Operational Value at Risk in the Banking Sector?",The6th Annual Premier Global Event on ERM.
  • 7Opdyke,J.D,2014,“Estimating Operational Risk Capital with Greater Accuracy,Precision,and Robustness",The Journal of Operational Risk,9(4):3-79.
  • 8Baud,N.,A.Frachot and T.Roncalli,2003,“How to Avoid Over-estimating Capital Charge for Operational Risk?",OperationalRisk-Risk’Newsletter.
  • 9Na,H.S.,D.B.J.Van,L.C.Miranda and M.Leipoldt,2006,“An Econometric Model to Scale Operational Losses“,Operational Risk,1(2):11-31.
  • 10Carrillo-Menéndez,S.and A.Suárez,2012,“Robust quantification of the exposure to operational risk:Bringing economic sense to economic capital",Computers&Operations Research,39(4):792-804.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework[S]. Bank for International Settlements, 2004.
  • 2Federal Reserve System, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Results of the 2004 Loss Data Collection Exercise for Operational Risk[Z]. 2005.
  • 3Hans B. Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory[M]. Germany: Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 1970.
  • 4Bocker K, KlAuppelberg C. Operational VaR: A closed-form approximation[J]. Risk of London, 2005, 18(12): 90-93.
  • 5Bocker K, Sprittulla J. Operational VaR: Meaningful means[J]. Risk of London, 2006, 19(12): 96-98.
  • 6Bocker K. Operational risk analytical results when high-severity losses follow a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD)[J]. Risk of London, 2006, 8(4): 117-120.
  • 7Moscadelli M. The modelling of operational risk: Experience with the analysis of the data collected by the Basel Committee[R]. Italy, Banca D'Italia, Termini di discussione Number 517, 2004.
  • 8Chapelle A, Crama Y, Hiibner G, et al. Practical methods for measuring and managing operational risk in the financial sector: A clinical study[J]. Journal of Banking ~ Finance, 2008, 32(6): 1049-1061.
  • 9Baud N, Frachot A, Roncalli T. How to avoid over-estimating capital charge for operational risk?JR]. Operational Risk-Risk's Newsletter, 2003.
  • 10Frachot A, Moudoulaud O, Roncalli T. Loss Distribution Approach in Pratice, in Micheal Ong, The Basel Handbook: A Guide for Financial Practitioners[M]. Risk Books, 2007: 503-565.

共引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部