期刊文献+

火车司机职业紧张现状及其影响因素分析 被引量:7

The prevalence status and associated factors of occupational stress among locomotive drivers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨火车司机的职业紧张现状及其影响因素。方法采用整群抽样的方法,抽取某铁路局机务段1 117名火车司机作为调查对象,进行职业紧张及其相关因素的问卷调查,采用χ2检验、χ2分割(或趋势)检验和多因素非条件logistic回归分析进行统计分析。结果火车司机的高水平职业紧张发生率为72.84%;动车(或高铁)司机和货车司机的职业紧张水平相同,均高于客车司机(P<0.05/3)。Logistic回归分析显示:回报、应付策略、正性情绪和工作满意感是火车司机职业紧张的保护因素(P<0.05);付出、角色冲突和每日紧张感是其危险因素(P<0.05)。付出和负性情绪是动车(或高铁)司机的危险因素(P<0.05);付出和角色冲突是客车司机的危险因素(P<0.05),回报是其保护因素(P<0.05);付出、角色冲突和每日紧张感是货车司机的危险因素(P<0.05),回报、应付策略和工作满意感是其保护因素(P<0.05)。结论火车司机高水平职业紧张的发生率较高,应结合不同工种职业紧张的危险因素和保护因素采取综合防控措施,有效预防高水平职业紧张的发生。 Objective This study aimed to investigate the prevalence status and associated factors of occupational stress among locomotive drivers. Methods A cluster sampling survey of occupational stress and associated factors were conducted on 1117 locomotive drivers from a railway bureau by questionnaires The relationship of occupational stress and associated factors was analyzed by Chi-square tests and multivariate non- conditional logistic regression respectively. Results The prevalence rate of the higher level of occupational stress was 72.84%. The same levels of occupational stress for high-speed train drivers and freight train drivers were higher than passenger train drivers(P〈0.05/3). By the logistic regression analysis, effort, coping strategy, positive affectivity and job satisfaction were protective factors for the level of occupational stress for locomotive drivers(P〈0.05). Effort role conflict and daily hassles were risk factors(P〈0, 05), Effort and negative affectivity were risk factors for high-speed train drivers(P〈0.05). Effort and role conflict were risk factors for passenger train drivers(P〈0.05), reword was a protective factor(P〈0.05). Effort, role conflict and daily hassles were risk factors for freight train drivers (P 〈 0.05). Reword, coping strategy and job satisfaction were protective factors (P〈0.05). Conclusions The prevalence rate of the higher level of occupational stress was considerable high for locomotive drivers. Some different kinds of preventive measures for risk factors and protective factors should be carried out to prevent occupational stress.
出处 《工业卫生与职业病》 CAS 2016年第2期85-89,共5页 Industrial Health and Occupational Diseases
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划重大项目(201001009) 河南省卫生科技创新型人才工程科技领军人才基金(3022)
关键词 火车司机 职业紧张 危险因素 保护因素 Locomotive driver Occupational stress Risk factor Protective factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1钟霞,姜乾金,吴志霞,钱丽菊.生活事件社会支持压力反应对医务人员应对方式的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2004,13(5):560-562. 被引量:86
  • 2马良庆,吕玉民,娄淑艳,周连城,韩林,李镇江,余善法,崔明煊.职业紧张对机体免疫功能影响的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1995,4(4):185-186. 被引量:14
  • 3齐九颖,曲银娥.某高校学生职业紧张因素分析[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2006,9(7):760-763. 被引量:4
  • 4Pavne N.Occupational stressors and coping as determinants of burnout in female hospice nurses[J].J Adv Nurs,2001,33(3):396-405.
  • 5Muhonen T,Torkelson E.The demand-control-support model and health among women and men in similar occupations[J].J Behav Med,2003,26(6):601-613.
  • 6Lee JK.Job stress,coping and health perceptions of Hong Kong primary care nurses[J].Int J Nurs Pract,2003,9(2):86-91.
  • 7Healy CM,Mckay MF.Nursing Stress:the effects of coping strategies and job satisfaction in a sample of Australian nurses[J].J Adv Nurs,2000,31(3):681-688.
  • 8Kitaoka-Higashiguchi K,Nakagawa H,Morikawa Y,et al.Social support and individual styles of coping in the Japanese workplace:An occupational stress model by structural equation analysis[J].Stress and Health,2003,10(19):37-43.
  • 9Lapierre S, Bover R, Desjardins S, et al. Daily hassles, physical illness, and sleep problems in older adults with wishes to die. Int Psychoqeriatr,2012,24 ( 2 ) : 243-252.
  • 10姚三巧,李小明,李佳,等.矿山应急救援人员每日紧张感与神经行为功能改变的调查研究//中华预防医学会.转型期的中国公共卫生:机遇挑战与对策--中华预防医学会第三届学术年会暨中华预防医学会科学技术奖颁奖大会、世界公共卫生联盟第一届西太区公共卫生大会、全球华人公共卫生协会第五届年会论文集.北京:中华预防医学会,2009.

共引文献86

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部