摘要
比较分析中美俄三国军队体能考核项目设置内容,得出以下结论:一是三国军队对动力型与静力型项目的比例分配,以及全身、躯干、上肢和下肢项目在体能考核中所占比重的认识和做法基本一致;二是我军体能考核项目比例分配不够均衡,可能导致训练中出现课目偏训,影响身体素质的全面发展;三是美军在体能考核中设置了一些贴近实战的战术性训练,而我军和俄军的体能考核还侧重于单个军人的身体素质以及体能与技能相结合的项目上,考核内容较少涉及贴近实战需求的战术项目内容。
By several researching methods,and depending on analyzing the set events of physical tests in the services of China,U. S.And Russia,this thesis draws three conclusions as follows: Firstly,in the proportional distribution of dynamic and stationary events,and in the proportion of the events of whole body,trunk,upper limbs,and lower limbs in physical tests,the Three Services have similar cognition and practice; Secondly,the proportional distribution of set events of physical tests of our army is not quite balanced,which may cause the fact that some events gain special attention while others don't in training,and influences the comprehensive development of physical qualities; Thirdly,U. S. Services have set some tactical events close to real- fight in physical tests,while Russia and China have just laid special stress on physical qualities of single serviceman and on the combination of physical fitness and skills,that is,the set events in physical tests are seldom involved in the tactical events needed by real- fight.
出处
《军事体育学报》
2016年第1期88-92,共5页
Journal of Military Physical Education and Sports
关键词
体能考核
体能标准
项目设置
比较分析
physical test
physical criteria
set events
comparative analysis