期刊文献+

公务员面试考官评分策略研究 被引量:4

Study on the Civil Servant Interviewers' Rating Strategies
原文传递
导出
摘要 公务员面试考官评分是影响公务员考试录用的重要因素,考官评分策略的形成与组合决定了考官评分决策;考官评分策略是多种评分心理行为基础上形成的多种评分方式的组合,实证研究表明公务员面试中考官使用了11种评分方式,形成"锚定策略"、"匹配策略"和"调整策略"3种评分策略。面试中不同考官对同一考生评分时采用的评分策略组合存在差异、同一考官对不同考生评分时采用了不同的评分策略组合,这些评分策略组合具有多样性、差异性和政治性。本文揭示了公务员面试考官评分策略的内在属性,归纳和提炼了公务员面试考官评分的规律和特殊性,为提高公务员面试考官评分信度和效度的理论研究和实践探讨提供了良好基础。 The evaluation score of the civil servant interviewers is an important factor to affect the civil service selection examination,the structure and pattern of the interviewers’ rating strategies determine the interviewers’ decisions.The rating strategy is a combination of many kinds of rating methods based on multiple rating psychological behaviors.The empirical study shows that 11 rating methods are used by the interviewers,which induce 3 rating strategies named "anchoring strategy", "fit strategy" and "adjustment strategy".There are differences between distinct interviewers’ strategy combinations when they rate the same examinee,while interviewers adjust their strategy combinations when they rate the same examinee in the interview,and the strategy combinations are various,different and political.The results reveal the intrinsic attributes of the civil service interviewer’rating strategies,generalize and abstract the procedures and the specialties of the civil servant interviewer’rating strategies,and provide a good foundation for improving the reliability and validity of the civil service interview in theoretical research and practical issues.
作者 陈芳 盛艳燕
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期20-25,共6页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"公务员遴选技术与岗位胜任力匹配度研究"(编号:14BZZ054)
关键词 公务员面试考官 评分心理行为 评分方式 评分策略 the civil servant interviewers rating psychological behaviors rating methods rating strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Kiker D S, Motowidlo S J. Effects of Rating Strategy on Interdimensional Variance, Reliability, and Valid- ity of Interview Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 1998, 83(5).
  • 2陈学军,林志红.面试考官的权重策略对评分和录用的影响[J].应用心理学,2009,15(4):356-360. 被引量:5
  • 3王文中.Rasch测量理论与其在教育和心理之应用[J].教育与心理研究,2004(4).
  • 4Van Vianen E M, Van Schie E C. M. Assessment of Male and Female Behaviour in the Employment Inter- view. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychol- ogy, 1995, 5(4).
  • 5Anderson N, Shackleton V. Decision Making in the Graduate Selection Interview: A Field Study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 63 ( 1 ).
  • 6Jackson D N, Peacock A C, Holden R R. Profes- sionalInterviewers' trait Inferential Structures for Di- verse Occupational Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1982, 29( 1 ).
  • 7Rynes S, Gerhart B. Interviewer Assessments of Ap- plicant Fit: An Exploratory Investigation. Personnel Psychology, 1990, 43 ( 1 ).
  • 8Kristof - Brown A L. Perceived Applicant Fit: Distin- guishing between Recruiters' perceptions of Person - job and Person -organization Fit. Personnel Psychol- ogy, 2000, 53 (3).
  • 9Kataoka H C, Latham G P, Whyte G. TheRelative Resistance of the Situational, Patterned Behavior, and Conventional Structured Interviews to Anchoring Effects. Human Performance, 1997, 10( 1 ).
  • 10Judge T A, Higgins C A, Cable D M. The Employ- ment Interview: A Review of Recent Research and Recommendations for Fruture research. Human Re- source Management Review, 2000, 10(4).

二级参考文献24

  • 1陈学军,王重鸣.内隐绩效模型对绩效评估一致性的效应分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):212-214. 被引量:8
  • 2黎恒.无领导小组讨论研究现状和理论进展[J].人类工效学,2005,11(3):61-63. 被引量:24
  • 3Arvey, R. D. , & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personal Psychology, 35, 281 - 322.
  • 4Barrett, G. V. , & Depinet, R. L. ( 1991 ). A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 46, 1012 - 1024.
  • 5Dougherty, T. W. , Ebert, R. J. , & Callender, J. C. (1986). Policy capturing in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology,71,9 - 15.
  • 6Graves, L. M. , & Karren, R. J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness : An experimental Policy-Capturing investigation. Personal Psychology ,45,313 - 340.
  • 7Guion, R. M. (1987). Changing views for personnel selection research. Personal Psychology, 40,199 - 213.
  • 8Jung, H.-W. (2001). A linear program model dealing with ordinal ratings in policy capturing of performance appraisal. European Journal of Operational Research, 134,493 - 497.
  • 9Kinicki, A. J. , Lockwood, C. A. ,Hom, P. W. , & Griffeth, R. W. (1990). Interviewer predictions of applicant qualifications and interviewer validity: Aggregate and individual analyses.Journal of Applied Psychology ,75,477 - 486.
  • 10Liden, R. C. , Martin, C. L. , & Parsons, C. K. ( 1993 ). Interviewer and applicant behaviors in employment interviews. Academy of Management Journal,36,372 - 385.

共引文献30

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部