期刊文献+

中国细菌耐药监测研究2013至2014年非发酵革兰阴性菌监测报告 被引量:32

Antimicrobial susceptibility of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria: results from China Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Trial Program, 2013 - 2014
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的监测我国主要城市三级甲等医院住院患者非发酵革兰阴性菌耐药状况,掌握耐药流行趋势,为抗生素合理使用提供科学数据。方法按照统一方案定点收集来自全国19座城市19家医院2013年7月至2014年6月临床分离致病菌,每家医院约100株,由北京大学第一医院临床药理研究所作为中心实验室,统一采用平皿二倍稀释法测定抗菌药物MIC,参照美国CLSI或欧洲药敏委员会(EUCAST)2015标准判定细菌敏、耐药,以统计软件SPSS17.0计算MIC50、MIC90、MICm目及敏感率、耐药率。结果共1535株细菌进入MIC结果统计,铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌对亚胺培南的耐药率分别为28.0%(180/644)和70.5%(456/647),多重耐药(MDR)菌检出率分别为34.9%(225/644)和79.6%(515/647),泛耐药(XDR)菌检出率分别为9.8%(63/644)和72.2%(467/647)。不同病房、不同年龄以及不同标本来源菌株耐药率比较显示,分离自ICU菌株的耐药率高于非ICU菌株,其中鲍曼不动杆菌更为明显,来自ICU菌株耐药率多在52.4%~90.9%,明显高于分离自非ICU菌株的34.0%~73.3%(t=2.209,P=0.032);儿童患者分离菌中非发酵菌所占比例及耐药率均显著低于成人患者与老年患者(3.2%~50.0%、7.1%~81.3%,t=-2.800~-5.671,P均〈0.01);来自痰标本的铜绿假单胞菌较来自血和引流液的菌株更耐药(18.7%~74.2%、0.0%~75.4%,t=2.337~2.707,P均〈0.05);来自引流液的鲍曼不动杆菌耐药率显著高于来自尿标本的菌株(19.7%~88.2%VS6.0%~66.0%,t=2.884,P=0.006)。结论铜绿假单胞菌、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌、洋葱伯克霍尔德菌近年来耐药率稳定,但鲍曼不动杆菌耐药率持续增长,特别对于原本具有较好体外抗菌作用的药物,如米诺环素等。非发酵革兰阴性菌多重耐药已成为世界关注问题。 Objective To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of nonfermenting gramnegative bacteria in nationwide' s tertiary hospitals and understand the trend of antimicrobial resistance. Methods The clinical isolates were collected from 19 tertiary hospitals in 19 cities nationwide over the period from July 2013 to June 2014 according to the same protocol. About 100 strains were collected from each hospital. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were tested using agar dilution method recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in the central laboratory (Institute of Clinical Pharmacoloty, Peking University First Hospital ). The susceptibilities of isolates to antimicrobial agents were determined using CLSI or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2015 guideline. SPSS 17.0 was used to caculated MICs0, MICg0, MICra,g,, susceptible rate and resistance rates. Results A total of 1 535 pathogenic isolates were studied. Based on the MIC results, resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii to imipenem were 28.0% ( 180/ 644) and 70. 5% (456/647) . Multidrug resistance rate of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were 34. 9% (225/644) and 79. 6% (515/647), and extensively drug-resistance rate were 9.8% (63/644) and 72. 2% (467/647), respectively. Resistance rate of strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) were higher than those from non-ICU, especially in A. baumannii (about 52. 4% -90. 9% vs 34. 0% -73.3%, t=2. 209, P = 0. 032). Relevance ratio and resistance rate of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria in children ( ≤ 14 years) were significantly lower than those from adults and old people ( ≥65 years) (about 3.2% - 50. 0% vs 7. 1% - 81.3% , t = - 2. 800 - - 5. 671, P 〈 0.01). Resistance rate of P. aeruginosa isolated from sputum were higher than those isolated from blood and drainage fluid (about 18.7% -74. 2% vs 0. 0% -75.4% , t=2. 337 -2. 707, P 〈0. 05), and resistance rate ofA. baumannii isolated from drainage fluid were higher than urine ( about 19.7% - 88.2% vs 6. 0% - 66. 0%, t = 2. 884, P = 0. 006). Conclusions Compared with past surveillance results, resistance rates of. P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Burkholderia cepacia were steady. Sustained growth of resistance rate of A. baumannii was identified, especially to some antibiotics showing good in vitro activity former, such as minocyclin et al. Multidrug resistance nonfermenting gram-negative bacterial has been a worldwide challenge for healthcare management.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期130-138,共9页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 抗药性 微生物 革兰阴性菌 微生物敏感性试验 药物监测 Drug Resistance, Microbial Gram-Negative Bacteria Microbial Sensitivity Tests Drug Monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Muramatsu H, Horii T, Morita M, et al. Effect of basic amino acids on susceptibility to carbapenems in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates [ J ]. Int J Med Microbiol, 2003, 293 (2-3) : 191-197.
  • 2李耘,吕媛,薛峰,张秀珍,胡云建,于庭,胡志东,赵建宏,潘世扬,胡必杰,俞云松,邓秋连,李艳,刘文恩,周玲,费樱,府伟灵,徐修礼,裴凤艳,孟灵,季萍,汤进,郑波,刘健,杨维维,张佳.卫生部全国细菌耐药监测网(Mohnarin)2011-2012年革兰阴性菌耐药监测报告[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2014,30(3):260-277. 被引量:155
  • 3Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et a!. Muhidrug- resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance [ J 1-[J].
  • 4李耘,胡志东,刘文恩,李曼宁,吕媛,薛峰,刘健,郑波,张秀珍,胡云建,赵建宏,潘世扬,赵旺胜,胡必杰,邓秋连,周玲,董方,府伟灵,徐修礼,裴凤艳,孟灵,季萍,杨维维,张佳.我国2009至2010年MOHNARIN项目临床分离常见病原菌的耐药监测[J].中华检验医学杂志,2012,35(1):67-87. 被引量:116
  • 5朱德妹,汪复,胡付品,蒋晓飞,倪语星,孙景勇,徐英春,张小江,胡云健,艾效曼,俞云松,杨青,孙自镛,陈中举,贾蓓,黄文祥,卓超,苏丹虹,魏莲花,吴玲,张朝霞,季萍,王传清,王爱敏,张泓,孔菁,徐元宏,沈继录,单斌,杜艳.2010年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2011,11(5):321-329. 被引量:651
  • 6Hoban DJ, Reinert RR, Bouchillon SK, et al. Global in vitro activity of tigeeycline and cmnparator agents : Tigecyclin Evaluation and Surveillance Trail 2004-2013 [ J ] . Ann Clio Microbiol Antimicrob, 2015 : 14:27. DOI : 10. 1186/s12941-015- 0085-1.
  • 7Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, et al. Antinficrobial susceptibility of gram-negative organisms isolated from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in US and European hospitals: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2009-2012 [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2014, 43 (4): 328-334. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ijantimicag. 2014.01. 007.
  • 8Fukuoka T, Ohya S, Narita T, et al. Activity of the carhapeuem panipenem and role of the OprD ( D2 ) protein in its diffusion through the Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane [ J ]. Antimicrob Azents Chemotber, 1993. 37 (2) : 322-327.

二级参考文献47

  • 1李家泰,李耘,齐慧敏,代表中国细菌耐药监测研究组.2002—2003年中国革兰阴性细菌耐药性监测研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(1):19-29. 被引量:296
  • 2李家泰,齐慧敏,李耘,代表中国细菌耐药监测研究组.2002—2003年中国医院和社区获得性感染革兰阳性细菌耐药监测研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(3):254-265. 被引量:224
  • 3Arias CA,Murray BE.Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century-a clinical super-challenge[J].N Engl J Med,2009,360(5):439-443.
  • 4Clinical and Laboratory Standads Institute.Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S].Fifteenth Informational Supplement,2010,M100-S20 Vol 30 No.1.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standads Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S].Fifteenth Informational Supplement,2010,M100-S20-U Vol 30 No 15.
  • 6Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute.Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria[S].Approved Guideline M45-A,Vol.26 No.19,2006.
  • 7Wang P,Hu FP,Xiong ZZ,et al.Susceptibility of ESBL-Producing nterobacteriaceae with the New CLSI Breakpoints[J].J Clin Microbiol,2011,49(6):3127-3131.
  • 8Yang Q,Wang H,Sun H,et al.Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Enterobacteriaceae with decreased susceptibility to carbapenems:results from large hospital-based surveillance studies in China[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2010,54(1):573-577.
  • 9Wang H.Guo P,Sun HL,et al.Molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Acinerobacter spp from Chinese hospitals[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2007,51(11):4022-4028.
  • 10Nakamura T,Shimizu C,Kasahara M,et al. Differences in antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa,isolated from blood cultures,set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy.J Infect Chemother,2007,13:24-29.

共引文献890

同被引文献228

引证文献32

二级引证文献298

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部