期刊文献+

下唇挡联合改良上颌斜面导板矫治下颌后缩的临床疗效观察

Observation on the clinical effect of mandibular lip bumper combined with improved maxillary inclined guide plate in the treatment of mandibular retrusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析应用下唇挡与改良上颌斜面导板联合矫治生长发育期下颌后缩错牙合的临床疗效。方法取2008年至2012年16例由于下唇肌及颏肌紧张导致下颌发育不足、下颌后缩的病例,均处于替牙晚期或恒牙早期。应用双期矫治,即先采用下唇挡经过8~10个月的I期矫治,解除下唇肌及颏肌紧张,再用固定矫治器结合改良上颌斜面导板矫治器进行Ⅱ期矫治。结果 16例患者治疗后下颌骨均明显向前生长,SNB角增大,ANB角明显减小,前牙覆牙合覆盖及磨牙关系基本正常,侧貌协调,矫治前后有显著差异。结论下唇挡结合改良上颌斜面导板矫治由下唇肌及颏肌紧张导致下颌后缩可取得良好效果,不仅可以解除下唇肌及颏肌紧张,还能刺激下颌骨前端骨质生长的作用。 Objective To analysis the clinical curative effect of mandibular lip bumper and improved maxillary inclined bite- plate in the treatment of growth and development period mandibular retrusion malocclusion.Methods Patients with mandibular deficiency and mandibular retrusion due to lower lip muscle mentalis muscle tension from 2008 to 2012 were contained in this clinical observation.The mandibular lip bumpers were used as phase I treatment for 8-10 months to relieve the muscle tension of lower lip and chin,then fixed appliance combined with improved maxillary inclined guide plate appliance as phaseⅡtreatment.Results After the treatment,the 16 patients grew forward obviously,SNB angle increased,ANB angle decreased.Overbite,overjet and molar relationship were basically normal,profile coordinated,they were significant different from these before treatment( P 0.05).Conclusions Effects are obvious when mandibular lip bumper is combined with improved maxillary inclined guide- plate in the treatment of patients with mandibular retrusion.The treatment can not only relieve muscle of lower lip and chin muscle tension,but also stimulate the growth of mandible front- end bone.
作者 陈敏
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2016年第3期337-338,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 下唇挡 改良上颌斜面导板 下颌后缩 Mandibular lip bumper Improved maxillary inclined plate Mandibular retrusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1李小彤,张丁,傅民魁.安氏Ⅱ~2非拔牙矫治前后的牙颌面软硬组织变化[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1999,15(4):161-164. 被引量:14
  • 2徐春华,胡小坤,陈文静.改良Twin-Block矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ~2类错的临床观察[J].口腔医学,2011,31(10):586-587. 被引量:6
  • 3张雷英,蔡中.Twin block结合下唇挡矫治Ⅱ类Ⅰ分类错疗效分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2006,20(4):361-363. 被引量:2
  • 4Onnell SO, Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Perioral forces and dental changes resulting from mandibular lip bumper treatment [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,13:247-255.
  • 5Osborn WS, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Mandibular arch perimeter changes with lip bumper treatment [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991,99:527-532.
  • 6Soo ND, Moore RN. A technique for measurement of intraoral lip pressures with lip bumper therapy [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991,99:409-417.
  • 7Nevant CT, Buschang PH,Alexander RG et al. lip bumper therapy for gaining arch length[ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991 , 100:330-336.
  • 8Hodge JJ, Nanda RS, Ghosh J, et al. Forces produced by lip bumpers on mandibular molars [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofaeial Orthop, 1997,111:613-622.
  • 9Davidovitch M, Melnnis D, Lindauer SJ. The effects of lip bumper therapy in the mixed dentition [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997,111:52-58.
  • 10林珠.口腔正畸学[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2000:308-346.

二级参考文献27

  • 1李小彤,张丁,傅民魁.安氏Ⅱ~2非拔牙矫治前后的牙颌面软硬组织变化[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1999,15(4):161-164. 被引量:14
  • 2徐宝华,林久祥.前牙闭锁合下颌运动轨迹及X线头影测量的综合研究[J].北京医科大学学报,1995,27(5):361-362. 被引量:10
  • 3袁东辉,王俊祥,谢丽丽,刘霞.Twin-block矫治器矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错后口腔功能间隙变化的分析[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(6):851-853. 被引量:4
  • 4Clark WJ. The twinblock traction technique [J].Am J Orthod, 1988,93:1.
  • 5林久祥,许大民.现代口腔正畸学[M].3版.北京:中国医药科技出版社,1999:235.
  • 6徐芸,白玉兴,宋一平.口腔正畸功能矫形治疗学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:266.
  • 7Kim TW, Little RM. Post-retention assessment of deep overbite Cor-rection in Class II Division 2 malocclusion[J]. Angle Orth- od,1999,69(2) : 175 - 178.
  • 8Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Post treatment changes after successful Cor-rection of Class I1 malocclusions with the Twin-block appli-ance [J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000, 118 ( 1 ) : 24 -33.
  • 9Lapatki BG, Mager AS, Schuhe-Moenting J, et al. The importance of the level of the lip line and resting lip pressure in class II ,divi- sion 2 malocclusion[ J]. J Dent Res,2002,81 (5) :323 - 328.
  • 10Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, et al. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in class I1 division 1 malocclusions [J]. Eur J Orthod,1996,18( 1 ) :27 -40.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部