期刊文献+

“绿色群岛”城市概念的历史语境分析与当代解读 被引量:1

Green Archipelago:Its Historical Context Analysis and Contemporary Interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在应对城市衰退的策略中,昂格尔斯(O.M.Ungers)提出的绿色群岛(Green Archipelago)概念将紧缩城市作为一种积极现实而非消极问题。既有研究将昂格尔斯提出的绿色群岛城市概念还原到历史语境中讨论并从当代柏林城市现实的视角进行解读以明晰其重要意义。对历史语境的分析包括理论的形成语境和现实语境。首先分析对理论形成具有重要影响的两个要素:申克尔的设计思想;昂格尔斯在康奈尔大学的执教经历。然后分析该理论与当时主导柏林的建筑理论的差异。基于对绿色群岛概念的形成语境和现实语境的分析,可以梳理出该理论的独特之处。最终,本文从柏林当代城市性和临时性利用的角度对该理论进行解读,并认为这一概念在保证当今城市多样性和身份认同层面仍具有重要意义。 In the discussion of metropolis decline, the concept of Green Archipelago proposed by O.M.Ungers conceived shrinking cites as positive urban reality rather than a negative problem. This concept will be discussed in the historical context and interpreted in view of urban reality of contemporary Berlin. In this way, the significance of Green Archipelago could be clarified. The analyzing of historical context thus includes the context of theory formation and the context of reality. The former is consist of two significant influential factors, namely, the inspiration of architect Schinkel and design research during Ungers' teaching in Cornell University. The latter means its divergence with the architecture theory which dominated Berlin at that time. Basing on analysis above, the innovation of Ungers' concept will be revealed. Finally, through reinterpretation from contemporary urbanity of Berlin and the phenomenon of temporary reuse, I argue that the model of Green Archipelago is crucial to maintain urban identity and diversity of Berlin.
作者 孙德龙
出处 《建筑师》 2016年第1期62-70,共9页 The Architect
关键词 绿色群岛 柏林 城市性 多样性 身份认同 Green Archipelago, Berlin,Urbanity, Diversity, Identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Ungers O M. Die Stadt in der Stadt: Berlin das Grine Stadtarchipel-Ein stadtrSmeliches Planungskonzept ffir die zukfinftige Entwicklung Berlins, 1977.
  • 2Ungers O M, Koolhaas M, Kollhoff H, et al. Cities within the City[J]. Lotus International. L'isolato urbano/qqae urban block, 1978 (19): 82-97. p82.
  • 3Miegel M. Die deformierte Gesellschaft. Wie die Deutschen ihre Wirklichkeit verdringen. 4[J]. Aufl. Berlin.(zit. als MIEGEL 2005a), 2005.
  • 4Ungers O M. Stadtprobleme in der pluralistischen Massengesellschaft[J]. Transparent, 1971(5) : 32-38. pg.
  • 5Ungers O M. Die Sadt in der Stadt: Berlin das Grne Stadtarchipel-Ein stadtrimeliches Planungskonzept fiir die zuk0.nftige Entwicklung Berlins, 1977. pl.
  • 6Hertweck F. Berliner Ein- und Auswirkungen[M]. In : Hertweck F,Marot S, Die Stadt in der Stadt. Berlin: Ein Griines Archipel: Lars Miiller Publishers,2013 : 5669.p56.
  • 7F yon Buttlar, F Kirchner.Peter Joseph Lenne, Volkspark und Arkadien[M]. Nicolai. 1989.
  • 8Koolhaas R, Obrist H U, Ungers O M, et al. An Interview with OM Ungers[J]. Log, 2009: 50-95. p75.
  • 9Szambien W. Schinkel[M]. Ediciones AKAL, 2000.
  • 10Ungers O M.O.M.Ungers im Gesprlich mit Jan Pieper, Ober Typus und Ort in Kunstforum International[R]. 1984.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部