学理探讨中的政治博弈——抗战时期关于三民主义论战的再认识

The Political Game in the Study of the Theory of Science:Recognition of the Polemics on the Three People's Principles during the Anti-Japanese War

当下,学术界近乎将抗战时期的三民主义论战解释为一场纯粹意义上的学理论争,而忽略了论战的深刻异质性内涵和政治内容。实际上,在三民主义论战中,一方面,中共的确从学理意义上批驳了叶青的错误观点,深化了对马克思主义和三民主义的科学认识;但另一方面,中共也存在适应政治任务需要的内在诉求和意识形态化的价值取向,从而窄化了其进行学理层面探讨的视野,限制了其理论思考向更深层次的拓展。总之,论战从未与带有强烈现实关怀的政治意绪相隔梗。

Now, academic circles nearly see polemic interpretation during the period of Anti-Japanese War as a pure science theories, while ignoring the controversy of profound heterogeneous connotation and political content. Actually, in the debate of the Three People＇s Principles, on the one hand, it＇s true that the CPC from the academic significance refuted Ye Qing＇s errone- ous views, and deepened the understanding of Marxism and the Three People＇s Principles ; but on the other hand, the CPC had a political task with internal demands and ideology of value orientation, so as to narrow the academic level of vision, limiting its theoretical expansion. In a word, the polemics had a strong practical concern of political consciousness.