刑事司法行为法律评价与法律处遇两分论

On the Separation of Legal Evaluation and Legal Disposal of Criminal Judicial Acts

学术界对刑事司法行为存在着混淆法律评价与法律处遇的现象。对于欺骗性取证、引诱性取证等有着"相对之恶"的司法行为,这种混淆容易使人们依据司法实践中对这类行为的现实容许而反推其合法性,从而质疑刑事诉讼法第50条的效力。应当在逻辑上严格区分法律评价与法律处遇,同时将程序性制裁只是作为法律处遇可用的手段之一。法律评价与法律处遇两分论有着更强的解释现实的能力,可以为妥当的利益平衡创造理论空间,为刑事诉讼法的合理解释提供理论支持。

In academia, there exists the confusion of legal evaluation and legal disposal of criminal judicial acts. As to the deceptive investigation and enticing investigation which has relative evil, the foresaid confusion may make scholars infer legitimacy of the acts from the condoning phenomenon in judicial practice, thus questioning the effectiveness of Article 50 of criminal procedure law. The legal evaluation and legal disposal should be separated strictly, and the procedural sanctions should be regarded as one means of the legal disposal. This theory has stronger ability of interpreting the reality, can create theoretical room for interests balance and offer theoretical support for reasonable interpretation of the criminal procedure law.