期刊文献+

中央性前置胎盘高危因素及结局的病例对照研究 被引量:4

High-risk factors and pregnancy outcome for central placenta previa: a case-control study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨中央性前置胎盘发生的高危因素及其对妊娠结局的影响。方法:对我院283例中央性前置胎盘患者和126例正常剖宫产孕产妇进行病例对照研究。结果:病例组孕产妇的人工流产史、自然分娩史高于对照组(P〈0.05),而病例组孕周、产检次数低于对照组(P〈0.05)。病例组产后出血、胎盘粘连、胎盘植入、贫血等妊娠结局发生率均高于对照组(P〈0.05),而胎心和出生体重低于对照组(P〈0.05)。非条件Logistic回归分析表明,产检次数(OR=0.586,95%CI:0.515~0.666)是中央性前置胎盘的保护因素,人工流产(OR=1.843,95%CI:1.152~2.947)是危险因素。结论:中央性前置胎盘能增加不良妊娠结局的发生率;产检次数可以降低中央性前置胎盘发生风险,人工流产能增加其发生风险。 Objective: To explore the high-risk factors of central placenta previa and its adverse effects on pregnancy outcome. Methods: 283 pregnant and parturient women with central placenta previa were chosen as case group. 126 normal cesarean section cases without central placenta previa during the same period were randomly selected as control group. The high-risk factors and adverse effects on central placenta previa were in the comparison between two groups.Results: Compared with control group,the rate of artificial abortion and natural delivery in the case group were significantly higher( P 0. 05),and the gestational weeks and the frequency of antenatal examination were significantly lower( P 0.05). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage,adherent placenta,placenta accrete and anemia in the case group were higher than those in the control group( P 0. 05),but fetal heart and birth weigh were lower( P 0. 05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that antenatal examination( OR = 0. 586,95% CI: 0. 515-0. 666) may be the protective factors for central placenta previa,and artificial abortion( OR = 1. 843,95% CI: 1. 152-2. 947) may be the risk factors for central placenta previa.Conclusion: Central placenta previa can increase the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome. The frequency of antenatal examination may reduce the risk of central placenta previa,and artificial abortion may increase the risk.
出处 《现代医学》 2015年第12期1507-1511,共5页 Modern Medical Journal
基金 北京市支持海淀区社会事业研发专项项目(s2013009)
关键词 中央性前置胎盘 危险因素 妊娠结局 病例对照研究 central placenta previa high-risk factors pregnancy outcome case-control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献60

  • 1陈乔珠,何静妍,谢静颖.300例社会因素剖宫产术分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(4):411-413. 被引量:24
  • 2刘彩霞,王德智,李秀芹,杨玉侠,张健,兰涛.卡前列甲酯栓预防产后出血的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,32(1):22-24. 被引量:169
  • 3程蔚蔚,王彦琳.前置胎盘研究进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(6):323-325. 被引量:46
  • 4Ward C R.Avoiding an incision through the anterior previa at cesarean delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol,2003,102(3):552-554.
  • 5潘学田.中国进口药物手册[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,2001.229-230.
  • 6曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.2129.
  • 7王淑贞 主编.实用妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.208-209.
  • 8Oppenheimer L, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists ofCanada. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J ObstetGynaecol Can, 2007, 29:261-273.
  • 9Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placentapraevia, placenta preavia accrete and vasa praevia diagnosis andmanagement. Green-top Guideline No. 27. January 2011 [ EB/OL]. [ 2012-06-18] http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens_health/clinical-guidance/ placenta-praevia-and-placenta-praevia-accreta~diagnosis-and-manageme.
  • 10Cho JY, Lee YH, Moon MH, et al. Difference in migration ofplacenta according to the location and type of placenta previa. JClin Ultrasound, 2008,36:79-84.

共引文献488

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部