期刊文献+

不同麻醉方式的选择对颈椎手术中运动诱发电位监测的影响

Effects of different anaesthetic methods on motor evoked potentials monitoring during cervical spine surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用神经阻滞联合全身麻醉是否能够增加颈椎手术中运动诱发电位(MEP)的引出率。方法选择2015年1月至6月择期行颈椎减压内固定手术患者50例,随机分为2组(神经阻滞复合全麻组和全麻组),比较两组间术中运动诱发电位(MEP)的引出率是否存在差异。结果神经阻滞复合全麻组在术中引出率较高,神经阻滞复合全麻组中MEP波幅出现的阳性率为80%(20/25),而全麻组中MEP波幅出现的阳性率仅为44%(11/25),N组的MEP诱出率显著高于全麻组,两组之间有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在手术前采用神经阻滞麻醉后再行常规全身麻醉,可使术中引出MEP百分率较高,监护脊髓损伤记录更加的可靠,可能的原因在于神经阻滞减少了术中麻醉药物和肌松药物的使用,从而提高了MEP的引出率。 Objective To investigate the positive rate of MEP appearance in the anaesthetic method of nerve block associated with general anaesthesia. Methods Fifty patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression were included in this study from January to June in 2015. Patients were randomly divided into nerve block associated with general anaesthesia group and general anaesthesia group. The positive rates of MEP appearance during surgery were recorded and compared between two groups. Results The positive rate of MEP appearance in nerve block associated with general anaesthesia group was 80% (20/25) ,which was significantly higher than that of 44% (11/25) in general anaesthesia group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The anaesthetic method of nerve block associated with general anaesthesia can increase the positive rate of MEP appearance during cervical surgery,which may be caused by the reduced use of anaesthetic drugs.
出处 《外科研究与新技术》 2015年第4期254-256,共3页 Surgical Research and New Technique
关键词 颈椎手术 麻醉药物 运动诱发电位 监测 Cervical surgery Anaesthetics Motor evoked potential Monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1张琪,高萍,刘一.体感诱发电位在脊柱手术中的应用[J].吉林医学,2005,26(8):842-843. 被引量:2
  • 2刘新宇,郑燕平,原所茂,侯勇,杜伟.脊柱侧凸术中皮层体感诱发电位(CSEP)监护的应用价值[J].脊柱外科杂志,2005,3(4):231-233. 被引量:3
  • 3[1]Herdmann J,Deletis V,Edmonds HJ,et al.Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures.Spine,1996,21:879-885.
  • 4[2]Kalkman CJ,Drummond JC,Ribberink AA,et al.Effects of propofol,etomidate,midazolam,and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans.Anesthesiology,1992,76:502-509.
  • 5[3]Sloan TB,Erian R.Effect of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block on cortical motorevoked potentials.Anesth Analg,1993,76:979-984.
  • 6[4]Mills KR.Magnetic brain stimulation:a tool to explore the action of the motor cortex on single human spinal motoneurons.Trends Neurosci,1991,14:401-405.
  • 7[5]Ubags LH, Kalkman CJ, Been HD, et al.A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia.Anesth Analg,1999,88:568-572.
  • 8[6]Zhou H,Zhu C.Comparison of isoflurane effects on motor evoked potential and F wave.Anesthesiology,2000,93:32-38.
  • 9[7]Dongen EP,Beek HT,Schepens M,et al.Within-patient variability of myogenic motor evoked potentials to multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation during two levels of partial neuromuscular blockade in aortic surgery.Anesth Analg,1999,88:22-27.
  • 10[8]Kuizenga K,Wierda J,Kalkman CJ.Biphasic EEG changes in relation to loss of consciousness during induction with thiopental,propofol,etomidate,midazolam or sevoflurane.Br J Anaesth,2001,86:354-360.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部