摘要
目的:评估PLR和NLR在PCa和BPH初诊患者中筛查PCa患者的价值。方法收集我院2012年至2015年PCa和BPH住院患者96人;分析两组患者初诊PLR,NLR差异性,评估其诊断价值。结果 PCa患者的PLR中位数为103.6(IQR,88.1~120.7),BPH患者的PLR中位数为127.2(IQR,91.0~183.8),PCa初诊患者的PLR明显低于BPH初诊患者(P=0.011);PCa患者NLR中位数1.95(IQR,1.4~2.8),BPH患者NLR中位数2.6(IQR,1.7~4.5), PCa初诊患者NLR明显低于BPH初诊患者(P=0.008);应用ROC曲线分析,PLR的曲线下面积为0.664(95%CI,0.554~0.773),NLR的曲线下面积为0.643(95%CI,0.536~0.750),两指标均具有诊断价值;ROC曲线计算PLR和NLR的最佳cutoff值,PLR小于145,NLR小于2.55作为在PCa和BPH初诊患者中筛查PCa患者的依据,PLR小于145作为诊断标准的敏感度高达92.9%。结论 PLR,NLR可作为有价值指标在PCa和BPH初诊患者中筛查PCa患者。
Objective For prostate cancer ( PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) newly diagnosed patients, assess platelet lymphocyte ratio (platelet-lymphocyte ratio, PLR) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, NLR) screening value of PCa patients.Methods The database contains 96 PCa and BPH patients; analyzed two groups of patients with newly diagnosed PLR, NLR and evaluated the diagnostic value.Results The median PLR of PCa patients was 103.6 (IQR, 88.1~120.7) and BPH patients was 127.2 (IQR, 91.0~183.8) (P = 0.011); The median NLR of PCa patients was 1.95 ( IQR, 1.4~2.8) and BPH patients was 2.6 (IQR, 1.7~4.5) (P = 0.008); the area under the curve(AUC) recorded for PLR was 0.664 (95%CI, 0.554~0.773) and for NLR was 0.643 (95%CI, 0.536~0.750); calculation of the ideal cutoff values of PLR and NLR, PLR is less than 145 and NLR is less than 2.55 as the basis for screening PCa patients in PCa and BPH patients.Conclusion PLR, NLR can be used as a valuable indicator for PCa patients in PCa and BPH patients.
出处
《中国男科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2015年第10期25-30,共6页
Chinese Journal of Andrology