期刊文献+

开放式腹膜前间隙修补术与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较 被引量:2

Comparative Study of the Clinical Effect of Open Preperitoneal Space Repair and Lichtenstein Repair for Inguinal Hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹股沟疝采用Lichtenstein修补术和开放式腹膜前间隙修补术的临床效果和安全性。方法:将我院普外科收治的132例腹股沟疝患者随机分为两组,每组66例。一组患者采用Lichtenstein修补术进行治疗,另外一组患者采用开放式腹膜前间隙修补术进行治疗,对比两组平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、平均术后下床时间、平均术后住院时间、平均术后恢复时间;对比两组患者术后各种并发症的发生情况和1年内复发情况。结果:腹膜前间隙组平均手术时间、平均术后下床时间、平均术后住院时间、平均术后恢复时间略短于Lichtenstein组,平均术中出血量略少于Lichtenstein组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹膜前间隙组患者各种并发症发生率及术后1年内复发率明显低于Lichtenstein组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹股沟疝采用开放式腹膜前间隙修补术和Lichtenstein修补术治疗的临床效果均较好,但开放式腹膜前间隙修补术的并发症发生率和1年内复发率更低,临床优势更明显。 Objective: To compare the clinical effect and safety of Lichtenstein repair and open preperitoneal space repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: 132 patients with inguinal hernia in the department of general surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, 66 cases in each group. A group of patients were given Lichtenstein repair for the treatment, and another group were received open preperitoneal space repair operation. The average operation time, average bleeding volume, mean postoperative bed time and the average hospitalization time and average recovery time of the two groups were compared. The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and recurrence rate at one-year between the two groups were also analyzed. Results: The mean operation time, the average postoperative bed time, the average hospitalization time, the average recovery time and the average intraoperative bleeding volume in the preperitoneal space group were slightly shorter than those of the Lichtenstein group, while there was no difference between the two groups(P〈0.05). The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and recurrence rate at one-year of the preperitoneal space group were both significantly lower than those of the Lichtenstein group, and there were both statistically difference(P〈0.05). Conclusions: The open preperitoneal space repair and Lichtenstein repair treatment can both get well effect for the treatment of inguinal hernia, while the open preperitonealspace repair operation has a lower occurrence rate of postoperative complications and the recurrence rate at one-year, which shows more obviously clinical advantages.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第36期7124-7127,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(81403451)
关键词 LICHTENSTEIN修补术 开放式腹膜前间隙修补术 腹股沟疝 感染 并发症 Lichtenstein repair Open preperitoneal space repair Inguinal hernia Infection Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献134

  • 1中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:628
  • 2刘嘉林,周汉新,余小舫,鲍世韵,帅建,吴海雄,毕建钢,钟才能.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的应用解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2005,23(6):620-622. 被引量:5
  • 3腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(2):179-180. 被引量:36
  • 4郭仁宣,苏东明,主译. 腹外疝外科治疗[M]. 沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2003. 431.
  • 5Simons MP, Aufenaeker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal her- nia in adult patients[J]. Hernia,2009,13(4):343-403.
  • 6van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non- mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Br J Surg,2007,94(4):506-510.
  • 7Chastan P. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair, a retrospec- tive study of 3000 cases in one center [J]. Int Surg,2005, 90 (1):48-52.
  • 8Amid PK. The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty[J]. Hernia,2003,7(1): 13-16.
  • 9Mo kete M, Earnshaw JJ. Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice[J]. Postgrad Mcd J,2001,77(905): 188-190.
  • 10EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Br J Surg,2000, 87(7):854-859.

共引文献281

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部