期刊文献+

汉英口译中模糊限制语的使用与译员性别的关联考察—基于10场外事口译语料 被引量:3

Hedges in C-E Interpreting for Publicity and Its Correlation with the Gender of Interpreter
下载PDF
导出
摘要 模糊性是自然语言的一个基本属性。模糊限制语,作为最典型、常见的模糊语言,它在言语交际中的使用其实是一种交际策略。本文拟从口译研究的话语对话交际范式出发,基于近15年来中国政府官方发布的10场外事口译男女译员各5场语料,借助话语分析的方法,转写并定量统计其中模糊限制语的数量及比例,旨在观察男女译员使用模糊限制语的比例与性别是否存在关联或差异,再定性地挖掘该差异背后的动因,从而为口译产品及译员表现研究提供一个新的性别视角。 Vagueness is the basic nature of natural language. Hedges, as the most widely used language, are actually employed as communicative strategies in discourse. This paper collected ten government press conferences as research materials, which were interpreted by 5 five female interpreters and five male interpreters respectively. Then, this paper statistically analyzed the hedges in these ten transcribed texts, and compared the number of hedges used by female interpreters with the number of hedges used by male interpreters. Obviously, the research showed that the total number of hedges used in English was nearly twice of that used in Chinese. It suggested that the explicitation appeared in C-E interpreting. Meanwhile, the number of hedges used by male interpreter was a little fewer than that used by female interpreter. In the end, this paper tried to explore the reasons behind these differences so that to provide a new perspective for future researches on interpreting product and the performance of interpreter.
作者 胡娟 胡勤
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2015年第12期29-34,共6页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基金 "贵州省研究生教育教学改革重点课题"(编号:JG字2014第005号)的部分成果 特此感谢该课题的经费资助
关键词 模糊限制语 显化 译员性别 口译 交际策略 hedges explicitation the gender of interpreter interpretation communicative strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Brown&Levinson. Politeness." Some Universals in Language Usage I M ] .Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1987.
  • 2Baker, M. Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications I A ] . In Baker, M. Francis, G. & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (eds.). Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair I C ] . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin, 1993.
  • 3Hirschman, L. Language in Society I M ~ . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
  • 4Hyland, K. Writing without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles E J ] ~ Applied Linguistics, 1996 ( 17 ) : 433-454.
  • 5Key, M. Male~Female Language, with a Comprehensive Bibliography I M ] . Metuchen, N J: Scarecrow Press, 1975.
  • 6Lakoff, G. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts E J ] . Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1972 ( 2 ) : 458-508.
  • 7Lakoff, R. Language and Women's Place [ M ] . New York: Harper Colophon, 1975.
  • 8Vinay, J.P.&Darbenet, J. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation[ M ] . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1958.
  • 9陈林华,李福印.交际中的模糊限制语[J].外国语,1994,17(5):55-59. 被引量:175
  • 10何自然.模糊限制语与言语交际[J].外国语,1985,8(5):29-33. 被引量:275

二级参考文献5

共引文献450

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部