期刊文献+

Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions 被引量:3

Randomized Comparison of the Crush Versus the Culotte Stenting for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:The crush and the culotte stenting were both reported to be effective for complex bifurcation lesion treatment.However,their comparative performance remains elusive.Methods:A total of 300 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to crush (n =150) and culotte (n =150) treatment.The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12 months including cardiac death,myocardial infarction,stent thrombosis,and target vessel revascularization.Index lesion restenosis at 12 months was a secondary endpoint.The surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress at bifurcation sites were also be quantified.Results:There were no significant differences in MACE rates between the two groups at 12-month follow-up:Crush 6.7%,culotte 5.3% (P =0.48).The rates of index lesion restenosis were 12.7% versus 6.0% (P =0.047) in the crush and the culotte groups,respectively.At 12-month follow-up,the surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress at bifurcation sites in the crush group were significantly lower than the culotte group ([5.01 ± 0.95] × 10^-4 Newton and [6.08 ± 1.16] × 10^-4 Newton,respectively;P =0.003).Conclusions:Both the crush and the culotte bifurcation stenting techniques showed satisfying clinical and angiographic results at 12-month follow-up.Bifurcation lesions treated with the culotte technique tended to have lower restenosis rates and more favorable flow patterns. Background:The crush and the culotte stenting were both reported to be effective for complex bifurcation lesion treatment.However,their comparative performance remains elusive.Methods:A total of 300 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to crush (n =150) and culotte (n =150) treatment.The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12 months including cardiac death,myocardial infarction,stent thrombosis,and target vessel revascularization.Index lesion restenosis at 12 months was a secondary endpoint.The surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress at bifurcation sites were also be quantified.Results:There were no significant differences in MACE rates between the two groups at 12-month follow-up:Crush 6.7%,culotte 5.3% (P =0.48).The rates of index lesion restenosis were 12.7% versus 6.0% (P =0.047) in the crush and the culotte groups,respectively.At 12-month follow-up,the surface integrals of time-averaged wall shear stress at bifurcation sites in the crush group were significantly lower than the culotte group ([5.01 ± 0.95] × 10^-4 Newton and [6.08 ± 1.16] × 10^-4 Newton,respectively;P =0.003).Conclusions:Both the crush and the culotte bifurcation stenting techniques showed satisfying clinical and angiographic results at 12-month follow-up.Bifurcation lesions treated with the culotte technique tended to have lower restenosis rates and more favorable flow patterns.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第5期505-510,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Bifurcation Lesions HEMODYNAMICS Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Stenting Technique Bifurcation Lesions Hemodynamics Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Stenting Technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, Lef6vre T, Chieffo A, Hildick-Smith D, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary' bifurcation disease: Consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. Eurolntervention 2014;10:545-60. doi: 10.4244/EIJV1015A97.
  • 2Kornowski R. The complexity of stenting in bifurcation coronary lesions. JACC Cardiovasc lnterv 2013;6:696-7. doi: 10.1016/j. jcin.2013.04.005.
  • 3Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A, Kumsars 1, Niemelt M, Kervinen K, et aL Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coil Cardiol 2013;62:30-4. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2013.04.015.
  • 4Chatzizisis YS, Giannoglou GD. Shear stress and inflammation: Are we getting closer to the prediction of vulnerable plaque? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010;8:1351-3. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.126.
  • 5Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R, van der Baan A, Grosveld F, Daemen M J, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006;113:2744-53. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA. 105.590018.
  • 6Katritsis DG, Theodorakakos A, Pantos I, Gavaises M, Karcanias N,Efstathopoulos EP. Flow patterns at stented coronary bifurcations: Computational fluid dynamics analysis. Circ Cardiovasc lnterv 2012;5:530-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968347.
  • 7Wang H, Liu J, Zheng X, Rong X, Zheng X, Peng H, et aL Three-dimensional virtual surgery models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization strategies. Sci Rep 2015;5:10945. doi: 10.1038/srep10945.
  • 8Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, Liistro F, Airoldi F, et aL Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: Immediate results and 30-day outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;60:145-51. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10622.
  • 9Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the "culotte" technique. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:943-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00510-4.
  • 10Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D'Agostino R, Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-elating stents. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067731.

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部