期刊文献+

低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略 被引量:58

Dynamic Coordination Strategy of Vertical Cooperative on Carbon Emission Reduction in Supply Chain under Low-carbon Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 低碳环境下,考虑供应链上下游企业减排合作效果的跨期性和低碳产品需求的特征,借助微分博弈研究了单个供应商和单个制造商长期合作的两级供应链中合作减排问题。假设需求是产品减排量的线性函数,分别分析了供应链减排中制造商占主导供应商跟随的Stackelberg博弈情形及制造商与供应商纵向合作减排的情形,构建了两种情形下的动态模型,得到了各自相应的反馈均衡策略及产品碳排放量随时间变化的最优轨迹;并比较这两种反馈均衡策略,发现合作减排策略能提高产品的减排量,供应商和制造商以及整个供应链系统的利润也比非合作减排时有所提高,实现了供应链企业间的协调;最后,通过数值分析,验证了结论的有效性,并对相关参数进行了灵敏度分析,为供应链企业间的合作减排提供理论依据。 Research has already shown that global warming has a direct relationship with the emission of carbon and other greenhouse gases. Actions on climate change have been topping priority lists in many countries, especially with increasing pressures from the public. Many countries have attempted to enact legislation or design market-based carbon trading mechanisms for controlling carbon emission. Twelve countries and regions have enacted legislation to require that enterprises carry out carbon labeling systems. More than 1000 famous enterprises require "low carbon" in their supply chains, such as Wal-Mart, 1BM, IKEA, which have asked their suppliers to provide carbon labels. On March 2013, The National Development and Reform Commission in China issued provisional rules on the management of low carbon products certification in order to identify the main content of China's low-carbon products certification system. Low-carbon products certification can boost the consumption side to promote energy saving and emission reduction. With low carbon products certification, consumers will be able to purchase products labeled low carbon based on their preferences in order to encourage companies to spend efforts in developing low carbon products. Low-carbon products certification systems have a big impact for upstream and downstream activities in many industries. Firms have focused for the most part on reducing emissions because of physical processes, business practices and operational policies. Thus, it has important practical significance to discuss about emissions reduction through the cooperation between enterprises in upstream and downstream supply chains from the perspective of management. This study considers that reduction rate can affect the cooperation of carbon emission reduction between enterprises in product demand, and the upstream and downstream supply chains. In addition, this study assumes that demand has a linear relationship with carbon emissions. Vertical cooperation on carbon emission reduction is discussed based on a differential game in a two-stage supply chain consisting of a single supplier and a single manufacturer. In the first part, we analyzed the Stackelberg game scenario in which manufacturer is a leader and supplier is a follower in the supply chain with the goal of reducing carbon emissions. In addition, we built the Stackelberg differential game models and solved this differential game by using the HJB equation to obtain feedback equilibrium strategy, the optimal function of profit about manufacturer and supplier, and an optimal trajectory for carbon emissions of product. In the second part, we analyzed the other scenarios in which vertical cooperation between manufacturers and suppliers about emission reduction was presented. Moreover, we attained a feedback equilibrium strategy of manufacturer and supplier and the optimal function of profit about the entire supply chain and optimal trajectory for carbon emissions of product. After comparing the two feedback equilibrium strategies, this study proposed that vertical cooperation strategies about emission reduction could improve the emissions of product, and the profit of supplier and manufacturer. The entire supply chain system is higher than non-cooperation supply chains because of the coordination among enterprises in the supply chain. At last, numerical analysis is conducted to verify the validity of conclusions. In addition, sensitivity analysis of the relevant parameters is conducted to understand the cooperation between enterprises in the supply chain.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期147-154,共8页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71072155)
关键词 低碳 供应链 合作减排 微分博弈 STACKELBERG博弈 row-carbon supply chain cooperative on carbon emission reduction differential game Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Dinan T. Policy options for reducing C02 emissions[R]. Washington,D.C., The congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office,2008.http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8934/02-12-Carbon.pdf.
  • 2中国经济导报.低碳产品认证:期待改变“节能不低碳”怪现象[EB/OL]. http://www.ceh.com.cn/ztbd/jnjpzk/146186.shtml, 2012-11-17/2013-3-31.
  • 3国家发展改革委,国家认监委.关于印发《低碳产品认证管理暂行办法》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zclbtz/2013tz/t20130319_533084.htm, 2013-2-18/2013-3-31.
  • 4杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,张靖江.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86. 被引量:143
  • 5Zhang J, Nie T, Du S. Optimal emission-dependent production policy with stochastic demand[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 2011, 3(1-2): 21-39.
  • 6Hua G, Cheng T C E, Wang S. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011, 132(2): 178-185.
  • 7Song J, Leng M. Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies[J]. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2012, 176: 297-313.
  • 8Zhang B, Xu L. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, Published on line, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024i.
  • 9Elhedhli S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2012, 17(5): 370-379.
  • 10Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013,10(1): 99-116.

二级参考文献82

  • 1Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 2香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 3魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 4Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 5Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 6Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 7Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 8Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.
  • 9Bernard, A. , Haurie, A. , Vielle, M. , Viguier, L.. A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32(6): 1830-1856.
  • 10Cramton, P. , Kerr, S.. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather [J]. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(4): 333-345.

共引文献229

同被引文献461

引证文献58

二级引证文献473

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部