期刊文献+

零售商竞争环境下数量折扣和进场费组合的渠道协调策略 被引量:9

Channel Coordination Strategy Mixed by Quantity Discount and Slotting Allowances under the Environment of Retailer Competition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决渠道价格决策中的二次价格加成问题,研究者提供了众多渠道定价策略对渠道进行协调,其中,数量折扣定价策略得到了广泛运用,但该策略可能会导致渠道成员利润恶化。为了解决上述问题,本研究采用博弈论方法,提出了一种数量折扣定价和进场费组合的渠道定价策略,以同时实现渠道整体和渠道成员的优化,并采用示例方法对结果进行检查。论文以垂直一体化为协调目标、常规定价为参考基准,将数量折扣和进场费组合的渠道定价策略与两部定价策略进行比较分析,结果显示,数量折扣和进场费组合的定价策略使整体渠道达到理想的协调效果,同时,渠道成员的利润也得到了改善。 In order to solve the problem of double marginalization in channel pricing, researchers have proposed different pricing strategies to coordinate the marketing channel. Quantity discount is used widely, but this pricing strategy may hurt some channel partners. Therefore, it can't ensure that the goal of channel coordination is achieved definitely. Slotting allowance is given to a retailer by a manufacturer as one-off compensation allowance for the cost of product and service. It is usually offered to some powerful retailers by one manufacturer to motivate them to provide high level service for its products. The main reasons for the rising of slotting allowances are the scarce characteristics of retailer storage rack and the lack of retailer sale promotions. Slotting allowances can promote the abutment between consumer and product efficiency, and motivate the retailer to offer product promotion. Consequently, it is reasonable that the manufacturer takes slotting allowances as the supplement of channel coordination scheme. In order to achieve the efficient coordination of channels, the paper adopts the game theory to propose the channel coordination strategy mixed by quantity discount and slotting allowances to optimize the channel and partners at the same time. A case study is adopted to check the results. The paper considers the typical channel structure is made up of one manufacturer and two duopoly retailers as research objects. In the first part, it proposes some research hypotheses for the research mode. In the second part, the decision under vertical integration is discussed. The equilibrium results are set as the goal of channel coordination. In the third part, the decision under the pricing mode with the problem of double marginalization is analyzed. The equilibrium results are examined as the evaluation benchmark for channel coordination. The fourth part discusses one typical channel coordination strategy named two-part tariff. The equilibrium results are the evaluation reference for the channel coordination scheme proposed by this study. In the fifth part, the channel coordination strategy mixed by quantity discount and slotting allowances is designed, and the efficiency of the scheme is analyzed. The sixth part adopts one digital case to explain the efficiency of the channel coordination strategy. Finally, the management implications and direction of future research are discussed. Taking the vertical integration as the goal of channel coordination and the pricing mode with the problem of double marginalization as the evaluation benchmark, the paper compares the channel coordination strategy mixed by quantity discount and slotting allowances with two part tariffs. The results show that the channel coordination strategy mixed by quantity discount and slotting allowances can not only optimize the total channel, but also improve the profit of each channel partner synchronously through reasonable slotting allowances. Therefore, the channel coordination strategy proposed by this study is one ideal channel coordination strategy.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期155-160,共6页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972142,71172217)
关键词 制造商 零售商 数量折扣 进场费 渠道协调 manufacturer retailer quantity discount slotting allowances channel coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Ingene, C. and M. Parry. Channel Coordination When Retailers Compete[J]. Marketing Science, 1995, 14,360-377.
  • 2Raju, J., Zhang, Z.J. Channel Coordination in the Presence of aDominant Retailer[J]. Marketing Science, 2005, 24, 2,254-262.
  • 3Wang, Q., Wu, Z. Improving a Supplier's Quantity Discount Gain fromMany Different Buyers[J]. IIE Transactions, 2000, 32, 11,1071-1079.
  • 4Ingene, C. and M. Parry. Manufacturer-Optimal Wholesale PricingWhen Retailers Compete [J]. Marketing Letters, 1998,9,1,65-77.
  • 5Moorthy, K.S. Managing Channel Profits: Comment [J]. MarketingScience, 1987, 6(4), 375-379.
  • 6Wang, Y., Jiang, L.,Shen, S.J. Channel Performance under ConsignmentContract with Revenue Sharing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50 (1),3*47.
  • 7Cachon, G. and K.ok, A.G. Competing manufacturers in a retail supplychain: On contractual form and coordination [J]. Management Science,2010,56(3), 571-589.
  • 8Xin, D. and Liu, T. Sales effort free riding and coordination with pricematch and channel rebate [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2012,219(2), 264^271.
  • 9艾兴政,唐小我,倪得兵.价格上涨环境下供应链的渠道协调机制研究[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):24-30. 被引量:19
  • 10田厚平,刘长贤.非对称信息下分销渠道中的激励契约设计[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(3):77-82. 被引量:22

二级参考文献31

  • 1王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76. 被引量:60
  • 2Fangruo C, Federgruen A, Yu-sheng Z. Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers [ J ]. Management Science, 2001,47 (5) : 693-708.
  • 3Fangruo C, Federgruen A, Yu-sheng Z. Near-optimal pricing and replenishment strategies for a retail/distribution system [J]. Operations Research, 2001,49(6) : 839-853.
  • 4Corbett C J, Groote X D. A supplier' s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information [ J ]. Management Science, 2000, 46(3) : 445-450.
  • 5Viswanathan S, Piplani R. Coordinating supply chain inventories through common replenishment epochs [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(2) : 277-286.
  • 6Pastemack B A. Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities[J]. Marketing Science, 1985, 4(4): 166-176.
  • 7Yeom S, Balachandran K, Ronen J. The role of transfer price for coordination and control within a firm [ J ]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2000, 14(2) : 161-192.
  • 8Carlos J V, Marc G. A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129( 1 ) : 134-158.
  • 9Corbett C J , Tang C S. Designing supply contracts : Contract type and information asymmetry[A]. In Tayur S, Magazine M, Ganeshan R. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management [ C ]. Massachusetts : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. 269-298.
  • 10Ernst R, Powell S G. Manufacturer incentives to improve retail service levels [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 104(3): 437-450.

共引文献39

同被引文献82

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部