摘要
生产是历史唯物主义的重要哲学概念,鲍德里亚却错误地认为马克思的生产是一种"镜像",是资本主义的"同谋",没有超出资本主义的"意识形态"。鲍德里亚在论述消费社会新特征时,无视使用价值的基础作用,片面地夸大消费符码的意义,落入了符号决定论。通过解构马克思的需要、劳动概念,鲍德里亚试图用象征交换作为资本主义生产逻辑的替代方案,反而使自己对社会的批判理解失去了现实的根基。
Production is an important philosophical concept in historical materialism,but Baudrillard mistakenly took it as a "mirror image",a capitalist "accomplice",which does not exceed the capitalist "ideology".When Baudrillard discussed the new features of the consumer society,he ignored the fundamental role of the usevalue of the products,and one-sidedly exaggerated the significance of symbols in consumption,which made him fall into symbol determinism. By deconstructing Marx's concept of need and labor,Baudrillard tried to use symbolic exchange as an alternative to the logic of capitalist production,which made his own critique of society lack of the realistic foundation.
出处
《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第1期12-16,共5页
Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
马克思
生产
鲍德里亚
符码
象征交换
Marx
production
Baudrillard
symbol
symbolic exchange