期刊文献+

非营利组织对话沟通水平评价及其对捐赠收入的影响——基于微博环境下中国基金会的实证分析 被引量:2

Evaluation of dialogical communication levels of nonprofit organizations and their effects on the income from donations——Empirical analysis on foundations in China in microblog circumstance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于对话沟通理论,从粘性、创造回访、对话循环和信息有用性等4个维度评价了114家基金会使用微博与公众进行对话沟通的水平。结果表明,基金会在微博粘性、创造回访及对话循环等3个方面整体水平偏低,公募基金会与非公募基金会在不同指标上表现各有优劣。在微博使用策略方面,当前基金会主要采用推出策略和拉进策略来使用微博,将微博作为发布信息、知识传播和简单交互的工具,并没有将微博使用提升到知识创造的战略层面上。基于此,进一步分析了微博对话沟通水平对组织捐赠收入的影响。研究发现:微博对话沟通水平更高的公募基金会接收到的捐赠收入更多,但对于非公募基金会,微博对话沟通水平对其捐赠收入的影响并不显著。 According to the dialogical communication theory,the levels of 114 foundations conducting dialogical communications with the public in microblog are evaluated in the regards of stickiness,return visit,dialogue cycle and information usefulness. The results show as follows. The levels of foundations are low in general in microblogging stickiness,return visit and dialogue cycle. The public and nonpublic foundations perform their advantages and disadvantages in different indexes. Nowadays in microblog usage strategy,foundations adopt the promotion and attraction tactics,and regard microblog as the tool for publishing information,spreading knowledge and simple interaction,instead of upgrading microblog usage to the strategic level of knowledge creation. Meanwhile the effect of dialogical communication levels in microblog on the income from donations is analyzed. The result shows that the public foundations with higher dialogical communication levels in microblog have received more donations. But in the nonpublic foundations,dialogical communication levels in microblog have insignificant effect on their income from donations.
作者 刘志明
出处 《福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第1期83-88,共6页 Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(13YJCZ H116)
关键词 非营利组织 微博 对话沟通 捐赠收入 nonprofit organization microblog dialogical communication income from donations
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1KENT M,TAYLOR M,WHITE W.The relationship between website design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders[J].Public Relations Review,2003,29(1):63-77.
  • 2LOVEJOY K,WATERS R,SAXTON D.Engaging Stakeholders through Twitter:How Nonprofit Organizations are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less[J].Public Relations Review,2012,38(2):313-318.
  • 3SAXTON G,GUO C,BROWN W.New dimensions of nonprofit responsiveness:The application and promise of Internet-based technologies[J].Public Performance and Management Review,2007,31(2):144-173.
  • 4TAYLOR M.Building social capital through rhetoric and public relations[J].Management Communication Quarterly,2011,25(3):436-454.
  • 5张明新,张凌,陈先红.Web2.0环境下政府机构的对话沟通与社会资本——基于对公安微博的实证考察[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2014,36(10):55-60. 被引量:14
  • 6LOVEJOY K,SAXTON G.Information,Community,and Action:How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media[J].Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,2012,17(3):337-353.
  • 7英纳斯.默格尔,郑思斯,袁嘉祺,李亚.公共部门的社交媒体策略[J].中国行政管理,2012(7):128-128. 被引量:5
  • 8GUILLORY J,SUNDAR S.How Does Web Site Interactivity Affect Our Perceptions of an Organization[J].Journal of Public Relations Research,2014,26(1):44-61.
  • 9ADAM S,ERICH J,MAUREEN T.The Effects of Organizational Twitter Interactivity on Organization-Public Relationships[J].Public Relations Review,2013,39(3):213-215.
  • 10STEPHEN D,MELISSA D,AMANDA S.Using Dialogue to Build Organization-Public Relationships,Engage publics,and Positively Affect Organizational Outcomes[J].Public Relations Review,2008,34(1):25-31.

二级参考文献30

  • 1罗家德,2008.《组织社会资本的分类与测量》,陈晓萍、徐淑英、樊景立.《组织与管理研究的实证方法》,北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 2中国互联网络信息中心.《第32次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》,http.//www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201307/t20130717_40664.htm,2013-08-03.
  • 3人民网舆情监测室.《2013年新浪政务微博报告》,2013年12月发布.2014年1月5日下载于:http://yuqing. people, com. cn/n/2013/1226/c210118 -23952286. html.
  • 4Kent, M. L.,& Taylor, M. Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, vol. 24, no. 3 ,1998. pp. 321 -334.
  • 5Kent, M. L,Taylor, M.,& White, W. J. The relationships between website design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. PublicRelations Review, vol. 29, no. 1,2003. pp. 63 -77.
  • 6Rybalko, S.,& Seltzer, T. Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: HowFortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using twitter. Public Relations Review ^ vol. 36,no. 4,2010. pp. 336 -341.
  • 7Mcallister-spooner, S.,& Kent, M. Dialogic Public Relations and Resource Dependency: New Jersey Community Colleges as Models forWeb Site Effectiveness. Atlantic Journal of Communication, vol. 17,no. 4, 2009. pp. 220 - 239.
  • 8Seltzer,T.,& Mitrook, M. ( ) . The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationships building. Public Relations Review,vol. 33 , no. 2,2007. pp. 227 -229.
  • 9Saffer, A.,Sommerfeldt, E.,& Taylor, M. The effect of organizational Twitter interactivity on organization - public relationships. Public Re-lations Review,vol. 39, no. 2, 2013. pp. 213 - 215.
  • 10Bortree, D. , & Seltzer, T. ( ) . Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. PublicRelations Review,vol. 35,no. 3 , 2009. pp. 317 -319.

共引文献16

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部