期刊文献+

英国环境决策公民陪审团制度及镜鉴 被引量:1

UK's Jury System for Environmental Decision-making and Its Reference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了作为域外环境与公共决策领域普适性公众参与制度的公民陪审团制度,在其运行逻辑中,蕴含着抽选公民陪审员和遴选专家证人、专家证人小组接受公民陪审员的询问等基本程序。公民陪审团兴起的制度背景在于社会理性对技术理性的纠偏与协调,以及代议制民主向协商民主的转变趋向。从中可以得出的启示在于,自上而下地推动实现公众与政府的有效协作和互信,以多种形式的公众参与方式相互印证保证决策的科学性,以随机抽选的方式保证参与者的代表性,以交互性的质询和讨论方式保证参与质量,充分的程序和制度保障保证参与的有效性。 This paper studies the jury system that is one of the general public participation practice in environmental decision-making system in abroad. It contains select citizens' juror and panel of expert witnesses and other essential processes. Jury system lies in the background of the coordination of social rationality and technological rationality,as well as changes in representative democracy towards deliberative democracy. Inspiration can be drawn from it is that,the promotion of the public trust and effective collaboration with the government promotion,public participation in various forms to ensure scientific decision-making,in a random manner to ensure representativeness of the participants,to ensure participation quality through interactive questions and discussion ways,to ensure the effectiveness of participation through adequate procedures and institutions.
作者 陈幸欢
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期156-160,共5页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家社科基金西部项目"环境风险规制的法律限度与秩序重构研究"(14XFX018)
关键词 环境决策 公民陪审团 公众参与 Environmental decision-making Jury Public participation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1YOUNG Hee Lee, DAL Yong Jin. An analysis of citizens'jury on the Korean national pandemic response system [J] . Javnost-the pub- lic ,2014,21 (3) :23 - 38.
  • 2WENDY Kenyon,et al. Enhancing environmental decision-making using citizens' juries[J]. Local environment ,2003,8(2) :222 -230.
  • 3ANDREW Dobson. Listening, the new democratic deficit [ J ]. Political studies,2012,60 (4) : 855 - 856.
  • 4谭笑.技术问题决策中的专家话语和公众话语——柯林斯《重思专能》的方案[J].开放时代,2014(6):214-221. 被引量:18
  • 5GRAHAM Smith,CORINNE Wales. Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy[J]. Political studies,2000,48:61.
  • 6RACHAEL Gooberman-hill,et al. Citizens'juries in planning research priorities:process, engagement and outcome [ J ]. Health ex- pectations ,2008,11:272 - 273.
  • 7迈克尔·波兰尼.个人知识[J].许泽民,译.贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2000.
  • 8HARRY Collins, ROBERT Evans. Rethinking expertise [ M]. Chicago and London :The University of Chicago Press ,2007:20.
  • 9SHANE Doheny, CLAIRE O'neill. Becoming deliberative citizens:the moral learning process of the citizen juror [J ]. Political stud- ies ,2010,58:647.
  • 10RACHAEL Gooberman-hill, et al. Citizens'juries in planning research priorities:process, engagement and outcome [ J ]. Heahh ex- pectations ,2008,11:279 - 280.

二级参考文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部