期刊文献+

Quantitative Determination of Density of Ground State Atomic Oxygen from Both TALIF and Emission Spectroscopy in Hot Air Plasma Generated by Microwave Resonant Cavity 被引量:1

Quantitative Determination of Density of Ground State Atomic Oxygen from Both TALIF and Emission Spectroscopy in Hot Air Plasma Generated by Microwave Resonant Cavity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Two experimental techniques have been used to quantify the atomic oxygen density in the case of hot air plasma generated by a microwave (MW) resonant cavity. The latter operates at a frequency of 2.45 GHz inside a cell of gas conditioning at a pressure of 600 mbar, an injected air flow of 12 L/min and an input MW power of 1 kW. The first technique is based on the standard two photon absorption laser induced fluorescence (TALIF) using xenon for calibration but applied for the first time in the present post discharge hot air plasma column having a temperature of about 4500 K near the axis of the nozzle. The second diagnostic technique is an actinometry method based on optical emission spectroscopy (OES). In this case, we compared the spectra intensities of a specific atomic oxygen line (844 nm) and the closest wavelength xenon line (823 nm). The two lines need to be collected under absolutely the same spectroscopic parameters. The xenon emission is due to the addition of a small proportion of xenon (1% Xe) of this chemically inert gas inside the air while a further small quantity of H2 (2~) is also added in the mixture in order to collect OH(A- X) and NH(A-X) spectra without noise. The latter molecular spectra are required to estimate gas and excitation temperatures. Optical emission spectroscopy measurements, at for instance the position z=12 mm on the axis plasma column that leads to a gas measured temperature equal to 3500 K, an excitation temperature of about 9500 K and an atomic oxygen density 2.09× 1017+ 0.2×1017 cm-3. This is in very good agreement with the TALIF measurement, which is equal to 2.0×101T cm-3. Two experimental techniques have been used to quantify the atomic oxygen density in the case of hot air plasma generated by a microwave (MW) resonant cavity. The latter operates at a frequency of 2.45 GHz inside a cell of gas conditioning at a pressure of 600 mbar, an injected air flow of 12 L/min and an input MW power of 1 kW. The first technique is based on the standard two photon absorption laser induced fluorescence (TALIF) using xenon for calibration but applied for the first time in the present post discharge hot air plasma column having a temperature of about 4500 K near the axis of the nozzle. The second diagnostic technique is an actinometry method based on optical emission spectroscopy (OES). In this case, we compared the spectra intensities of a specific atomic oxygen line (844 nm) and the closest wavelength xenon line (823 nm). The two lines need to be collected under absolutely the same spectroscopic parameters. The xenon emission is due to the addition of a small proportion of xenon (1% Xe) of this chemically inert gas inside the air while a further small quantity of H2 (2~) is also added in the mixture in order to collect OH(A- X) and NH(A-X) spectra without noise. The latter molecular spectra are required to estimate gas and excitation temperatures. Optical emission spectroscopy measurements, at for instance the position z=12 mm on the axis plasma column that leads to a gas measured temperature equal to 3500 K, an excitation temperature of about 9500 K and an atomic oxygen density 2.09× 1017+ 0.2×1017 cm-3. This is in very good agreement with the TALIF measurement, which is equal to 2.0×101T cm-3.
出处 《Plasma Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第3期259-265,共7页 等离子体科学和技术(英文版)
关键词 TALIF microwave air plasma atomic oxygen concentration actinometry optical emission spectroscopy TALIF, microwave air plasma, atomic oxygen concentration, actinometry,optical emission spectroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Niemi K, Schulz-von der Gathen V, Dobele H F. 2005, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 14:375.
  • 2Georg A, Engemann J, Brockhaus A. 2002, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 35:875.
  • 3Ono R, Ya.mashita Y, Takezawa K, et al. 2005, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 38." 2812.
  • 4Ono R, Takezawa K, Oda T. 2009, J. Appl. Phys., 106: 043302.
  • 5Reuter S, Winter J, Schmidt-Bleker A, et al. 2012, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 21:024005.
  • 67 Van Gessel A F H, Van Grootel S C, Bruggeman P J. 2013, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 22:055010.
  • 7Gupta M, Owano T, Baer D D, et al. 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89:241503.
  • 8Marchal F, Yousfi M, Merbahi N, et al. 2014, Phys. Sci. Int. J., 4:416.
  • 9Luque J, Crosley D R. 1999, "LIFBASE: Database and Spectral Simulation Program (Version 1.5) ", SRI International Report MP 99-009.
  • 10Wattieaux G, Yousfi M, Merbahi N. 2013, Spec- trochimica Acta B: Atomic Spect., 89:66.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部