西方理性选择理论演变脉络及其主要发展被引量：10

The Evolution of Context and Major Developments of Western Rational Choice Theory

导出

摘要经济学说的发展受基础理论的影响和制约。西方理性选择理论作为经济学的基础,它在假设前提、要素分析谱系和方法论等方面有着自身的演变脉络和发展轨迹。假设前提的变化,通常以潜在形式蕴含在各大经济理论间的承接和交融中,对这些承接和交融的分析,可以发现假设前提演变的脉络。要素分析谱系主要体现在以动机、偏好、认知和效用等为内容的分析程序和框架中,不同理论的要素分析谱系的区别,会造成理论分析侧重点差异和理论分歧。方法论主要表现为对行为主体的基本分析单元及其边界的确定,经济学家运用个体主义方法论所出现的差别,对应于不同理性选择理论各自的假设前提和要素分析谱系。我们探寻西方理性选择理论的演变脉络及其主要发展,可以通过比较分析西方不同理性选择理论的学理建构来完成,这是一项从基础理论来甄别各大经济学流派有关理性选择之分歧的研究工作,它能为进一步完善理性选择理论提供一些思想材料。 As the basis of economics, Western rational choice theory has its own context and the evolution of development path in the assumption, the pedigree of factor analysis and other aspects of methodology. Changes in assumptions, usually are in a latent form contains among major economic theories. The pedigree of factor analysis is embodied in the analytical framework of the motivation, preferences, cognitive and utility. Methodology mainly determines the basic unit of analysis unit of border actors. Exploring the evolution of Western rational choice theory and its main development, we can compare different construction analysis of West rational choice theory. It is a basic research work to identify the disagreement about the rational choice of the major economic schools.

作者何大安

机构地区浙江工商大学

出处《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期48-56,共9页 Academic Monthly

基金教育部人文社科重点研究基地浙江工商大学现代商贸研究中心和浙江省2011协同创新中心项目“现代商贸流通体系建设”(2014ZSDSM103) 浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地(浙江工商大学应用经济学)项目的阶段性成果

关键词假设前提要素分析谱系个体主义方法论选择偏好认知过程效用函数 assumption, pedigree of factor analysis, methodological individualism, select preferences, cognitive processes, utility function

分类号 F09 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献52

1亚当·斯密.《国民财富的性质及其原因的研究》,中译本,北京:商务印书馆,1988年.
2罗斯·哈里森.《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》第1卷,北京:经济科学出版社,1996年,第243-246页.
3Von NeumannJ. and O. Morgenstem, Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nded. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947.
4Arrow, K. and G. Debreu, "Existence of equilibrium for a competitive economy", Econometrica, 1954(22).
5J. C. Harsanyi, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games And Social Situations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
6Samuelson, P. A., "A Note On The Pure Theory Of Consumers' Behaviour", Economica, 1938(5).
7Houthakker, H. S., "Revealed Preference And The Utility Function", Economica, 1950(15).
8Arrow, K.J., "Rational Choice Functions And Orderings", Economica, 1959(26).
9Sen, A.K., "Choice Functions And Revealed Preference", Review Of Economic Studies, 1971(38).
10Arrow, K.J., "An Extension Of The Basic Theorems Of Classical Welfare Economics", In Proceedings Of The Second Berkeley Symposium Of Mathematical Statistics, ed. J. Neyrnan, Berkeley: University of California Press. 1951.

二级参考文献108

1何大安.行为经济人有限理性的实现程度[J].中国社会科学,2004(4):91-101. 被引量：151
2何大安.理性选择向非理性选择转化的行为分析[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):73-83. 被引量：108
3[英]约翰·伊特韦尔等,陈岱孙主编译.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.
4赫伯特·西蒙.1973:《从实质理性到过程理性》.载《西蒙选集》.245-269页,首都经济贸易大学出版社,2002年版.
5Harsanyi, J.C. Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
6Edgeworth, F. Mathematical Psychics[M]. London: Kegan Paul,1981.
7Dequech, D. Fundamental Uncertainty and Ambiguity[J]. Eastern Economic Journal,2000,26(1).
8Knight, F. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,1921.
9Keynes, J. M. A Treatise on Probability[M]. London: Macmillan, 1921.
10Savage, L. J. The Foundation of Statistics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons,1954.