检察建议用于刑事个案监督论要

Criteria of Prosecutorial Suggestions Used in Criminal Case Supervision

民事行政诉讼领域的二元监督方式,可为检察建议用于刑事个案监督提供参照。检察建议在刑事个案监督实践中已占有一定比重,主要用于存在显而易见错误的生效裁判,其纠错效果并不逊于抗诉。检察建议具有运行路径短、矛盾化解在基层、法院易于接受的优势,也存在法律依据不足、瑕疵纠错范围不详及法律效力虚化的劣势。在刑诉法中增设检察建议方式的基本构想为:确定检察建议的提出机关为作出生效裁判法院的同级检察院,发挥检察建议的效率优势;合理确定审判瑕疵的表现种类及纠正方式,增强一般检察建议的可操作性;灵活配置再审检察建议与抗诉的适用范围,使之集中于存在显而易见错误的案件,保证检察建议监督的精准性;明确法院的受理义务和答复义务,增强检察建议的监督刚性。

The binary supervision mode in the field of civil and administrative litigation can be used as reference for prosecutorial suggestions used in criminal case supervision. Prosecutorial suggestions have constituted a certain proportion in practical criminal case supervision, which are mainly against the plain error of the effective judgments and whose error correction is as effective as the protest to a judgment. The basic scheme of adding the prosecutorial suggestion system to the Criminal Procedure Law is to determine that the organ making a prosecutorial suggestion shall be the procuratorate at the same level as the court making effective judgment; to rationally decide the scope of judicial flaws and the mode of correction; to flexibly allocate the application scope of the prosecutorial suggestion for retrial so as to focus it on the plain error and ensure the accuracy; and to define the obligations of acceptance and response of a court to enhance the supervision rigidity of prosecutorial suggestions.