欧盟国家档案开放利用中隐私保护的立法特点及其借鉴被引量：8

Study on the Legislation Practices and Characteristics of Privacy Protection in Archives Publicity in European Union Countries

原文传递

导出

摘要档案开放利用中的隐私保护不仅是档案工作的内在要求,同时也是时代发展的客观需要。瑞典、德国、英国、法国作为典型的欧盟国家,隐私保护工作开展得较早,立法经验较为丰富,在档案开放利用中隐私保护问题上进行了长期的立法尝试并呈现出多样化特征。其以隐私保护具体原则为突破、以隐私保护各方主体为核心、以隐私利益与公共利益关系协调为导向、以隐私保护专属机构为平台的立法特点十分具有借鉴意义。 Privacy protection in archives opening and utilization is both an internal and external demand to archives work. As typical European Union countries,Sweden,Germany,Britain and France have a wealth of experience in such privacy protection legislation. And the legislation practice focuses on particular protection principles, main protection objects,the coordination of private and public interests,and the exclusive data protection agencies are of great reference significance.

作者闫静

机构地区中国人民大学信息资源管理学院

出处《图书馆学研究》 CSSCI 2016年第5期80-85,共6页 Research on Library Science

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目"国家数字档案资源整合与服务机制研究"(项目编号:13&ZD184)的研究成果之一

关键词档案开放利用隐私保护法规政策欧盟国家 archives opening and utilization privacy protection privacy legislation European Union countries

分类号 G279.1 [文化科学—档案学] DD912.1 [政治法律] D95 [政治法律—法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Giovanni Buttarelli. Europe's big opportunity EDPS recommen dations on the EU's options for data protection reform [ R]. Brussels: European Data Protection Supervisor, 2015.
2中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于加强和改进新形势下档案工作的意见》[J].中国档案,2014(5):12-14. 被引量：61
3Council of the European Union. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) [R]. Brussels, 2015.
4European Data Protection Supervisor. Additional EDPS Comments On The Data Protection Reform Package [ EB/OL]. [2015 - 10 - 15 ]. . https: //secure. edps. europa, eu/EDPSW ES/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/ Comments/2013/].3-03- 15 Comments_ dp_ package_ EN. pdf.
5Marit Hansen. Top ].0 Mistakes in System Design from a Privacy Perspective and Privacy Protection Goals E J. Privacy and Identity, 20].2.. 14-3l.
6邱琳雅,财图法人金融联合征信中心法务小组.德国联邦个人资料保护法(BDSG)[J].金融联合征信双月刊,民国97年第8期:60-64页.
7Harvey M. Choldin. Government statistics: The conflict between research and privacy [ J]. Demography, ].988= "/7 - 86.
8Mario. Viola de Azevedo Cunha. Data Protection Systems in the European Union: The UK Experience [ M]. Mario. Viola de Azevedo Cunha. Market Integration Through Data Protection: An Analysis of the Insurance and Financial Industries in the EU. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Springer, 2013 : 101 - 140.
9Livia lacovino, Malcolm Todd. The long - term preservation of identifiable personal data; a comparative archival perspective on privacy regulatory models in the European Union, Australia, Canada and the United States [J]. .Arch Sci, 2007 (?) : ].07 -127.
10The National Archives. ]. 9 million historic criminal records published online for the first time [ EB/OL]. [20].5 - t0 - 10]. http: //www. nationalarchives, gov. uk/about/news/]. - 9 - million - historic - criminal - records - published - online - for - the - first - time/.

二级参考文献13

1Ketelaar E. The Right to Know, the Right to Forget Personal Information in Public archives[J].Archives and Manuscripts, 1995, 23(1):8-17.
2O'Grady M J. Public Records, Privacy, and Electronic Access in Vermont[J].Legislative Coun- cil, Montpelier, 2005.
3Iacovino L, Todd m.The long--term preser- vation of identifiable personal data: a comparative archival perspective on privacy regulatory models in the European Union, Australia, Canada and the U- nited States[J]. Arch Sci, 2007(7):107-127.
4Sillitoe P J. privacy in a Public Place: man- aging public access to personal information con- trolled by archives services[J]. Journal of the Soci- ety of Archivists, 1998,19(1):5-15.
5Szekely I. Freedom of Information Versus Privacy: Friends or Foes? [EB/OL]. [2014-03-24]. http: //link.springer. c om/cliapter/10.1007% 2F978 - 1 - 4020-9498-9_18#page- 1.
6Association of Canadian Archivists.Archivist's Code of Ethics [EB/OL]. [2014-03-21]. http:// archivists, ca/content/code - ethics.
7Bonner B, Chiasson M, Gopal A. Restor- ing balance: How history tilts the scales against privon [J]. Information and Organization, 2009(19): 84-102.
8Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, et al. At- titudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on fo- cus group interviews[J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 2002 (3):1-10.
9Chik W B. The Singapore Personal Data Protection Act and an assessment of future trends in data privacy reform[J]. Computer LAW&: Secu- rity Review,2013(29):554-575.
10Zimmer M. "But the data is already pub- lic": on the ethics of research in Facebook [J]. Ethics Inf Technol,2010(12):313-325.