期刊文献+

“FDI降低东道国能源强度”假说在中国成立吗?——基于省区工业面板数据的经验分析 被引量:18

Is the Hypothesis "FDI Decreasing Energy Intensity of the Host Country" Valid in China?: Based on empirical analysis of Chinese provincial industrial panel data
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章针对能源经济学的假说之一“FDI降低东道国能源强度”进行经验检验,以中国省区工业面板数据为研究样本,通过建立理论模型和计量模型,在引入技术效应函数的基础上,厘清FDI结构效应、FDI技术效应与FDI收入引致的技术效应之间的关系,将FDI技术效应从FDI对中国工业能源强度的总效应中剥离出来。构建了FDI影响中国工业能源强度总效应的联立方程组模型,分别采用单方程估计方法(2SLS、GMM)和系统估计方法(3SLS)对联立方程组模型进行实证估计,并用弹性分析法计算FDI路径下不同影响效应的弹性大小和方向。研究结果表明:FDI对中国工业能源强度产生的总效应是积极的,即外资进入度每提高1%,总效应是使中国工业能源强度减少0.193%~0.243%,正面的FDI技术效应(0.185%~0.308%)和FDI收入引致的技术效应(0.077%~0.122%)超过了负面的FDI结构效应(0.064%~0.192%),实证结果支持该假说。 Using Chinese provincial industrial panel data,through the establishment of theoretical and econometric models,the paper clarifies the relationship between FDI composition effect,FDI technique effect and FDI income-induced technique effect on the basis of the technique effect function. The results show that: the total effect of FDI influencing China's industrial energy intensity is positive. If the degree of foreign capital entering increases by 1%,the total effect is to decrease China's industrial energy intensity by 0. 193% ~ 0. 243%. The positive FDI technique effect( 0. 185% ~ 0. 308%) and FDI income-induced technique effect( 0. 077% ~ 0. 122%) overwhelm the negative FDI composition effect( 0. 064% ~ 0. 192%),so these results support the hypothesis.
作者 李锴 齐绍洲
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期108-122,136,共15页 World Economy Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(项目编号:12&ZD059) 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(项目编号:71303176) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:13YJC790073)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Antweiler,Werner, Brian R. Copeland, M. Scott Taylor. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?. American Economic Review, 2001,91 (4) :877-908.
  • 2Bao Qun, Chen Yuanyuan. The Environmental Consequences of Foreign Direct Investment in China. in China's Dilemma:Economic Growth, the Environment and Climate Change, Edited by Ligang Song and Wing Thye Woo, Brookings Institution Press, 2008.
  • 3Catherine, Y. C. , J. A. List, L. D. Qui. Intellectual Property Rights, Environmental Regulations, and Foreign Direct Investment. Land Eco- nomies,2004,80(2) :153-173.
  • 4Cole, M.A. , Elliott, R.J. ,P. G. Fredriksson. Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations.'?. Scandina- vian Journal of Economies, 2006,108 ( 1 ) : 157-178.
  • 5Copeland, Brian R. , M. Scott. The Trade-induced Degradation Hypothesis. Resource and Energy Economics, 1997,19 (4) :321-344.
  • 6Copeland, Brian R. , Taylor, M. Scott. Trade, Growth, and the Environment. Journal of Eeonomic Literature, 2004,42 ( 1 ) : 7 -71.
  • 7Dua, A. , Esty, D. C.. Sustaining the Asia Pacific Miraele: Environmental Proteetion and Economic Integration. Washington, D. C. , Insti- tute for International Economies, 1997.
  • 8Eastin, J. , K. Zeng. Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Pollution Havens in China?. Mimeo, British Inter-University China Centre, UK. ,2009.
  • 9Eliste, Paavo,P. G. Fredriksson. Does Open Trade Result in a Race to the Bottom? Cross Country Evidence. mimeo, The World Bank, 1998.
  • 10Eskeland, G. S. , Harrison, A. E.. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 70 ( 1 ) : 1-23.

二级参考文献369

共引文献8966

同被引文献296

引证文献18

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部