期刊文献+

心理社会因素对军人值得信任特征的影响研究

The Impact of Social Psychological Factors on the Trustworthinessin the Soldiers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查分析军人值得信任特征及其形成的相关因素。方法采用人性哲学量表、症状自评量表、生活事件量表及埃森克人格因素问卷(EPQ),对1 783名军人进行测评。采用单因素方差分析、Pearson相关分析、多元回归分析。结果不同年龄、受教育程度、军种、婚姻状况、气质类型的军人之间值得信任特征有一定差异。军人值得信任因子正分、负分、总分与SCL-90总分及各因子分大多存在显著性相关(|r|=0.020~0.239)。EPQ的4个因子、年龄和生活事件负分总分因子进入以值得信任正分为因变量的多元回归方程(F=27.343,P〈0.01)。EPQ的N、L因子和生活事件负性社交因子进入以值得信任负分为因变量的多元回归方程(F=65.103,P〈0.01)。结论军人人际信任的高低,与气质类型和遇到的生活事件密切相关,另外也会受到年龄、受教育程度、军种、婚姻状况等因素影响,且直接影响着心理健康水平。 Objectives To investigate the impact of social psychological factors on the trustworthiness in the soldiers.Methods Investigation of 1 783 soldiers was conducted using Trustworthiness from Revised Philosophies of Human Nature Scale,SCL-90,EPQ and LES.Statistical methods included factor analysis,pearson correlation analysis,and multivariate regression analysis.Results Significant differences of levels of trustworthiness of soldiers were found between groups with different education levels,different kinds of services,different status of marriage and different temperament types.Trustworthiness were related with several factors of SCL-90(|r|=0.020~0.239).The four factors of EPQ,age groups,and the negative total score of LES entered into the stepwise linear regression equation with the independent variable trustworthiness positive scores(F=27.343,P 〈0.01).The N and L factors of EPQ,and the negative social score of LES entered into the stepwise linear regression equation with the independent variable trustworthiness negtive scores(F=65.103,P 〈0.01).Conclusions Level of trustworthiness of soldiers were closely related with temperament type and negative life events,and influenced by education level,different kinds of services,different status of marriage,and can affect their psychological health.
出处 《中国社会医学杂志》 2016年第1期49-51,共3页 Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
关键词 军人 值得信任 心理健康 气质类型 生活事件 Soldiers Trustworthiness Psychological health Temperament type Life events
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Deutsch M.Trust and suspicion[J].J Conflict Resol,1958(7):265-279.
  • 2高静美,郭劲光.企业网络中的信任机制及信任差异性分析[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(3):63-68. 被引量:39
  • 3Wrightsman LS.Measurement of human nature[J].Psychol Rep,1964(14):743-751.
  • 4杨德森.生活事件量表.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.100-106.
  • 5龚耀先.艾森克人格问卷[M].行为医学量表手册[M].北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005.36-38.
  • 6王征宇.症状自评量表(SCL-90).上海精神医学,1984,2(2):68-70.
  • 7刘期,王建民,赵圆圆,蔡娜.人性哲学对交警工作满意度的影响[J].湖北警官学院学报,2010,23(6):70-73. 被引量:2
  • 8Cadenhead.A,Richman.C.The effects of interpersonal trust and group status on prosocial and aggressive behaviors[J].Soc Beha Personal,1996,12(5):169-184.

二级参考文献26

  • 1杨中芳,彭泗清.中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点[J].社会学研究,1999(2):3-23. 被引量:554
  • 2郑伯.企业组织中上下属的信任关系[J].社会学研究,1999(2):24-39. 被引量:170
  • 3闫春平.大学生人际关系敏感及相关因素研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(8):753-755. 被引量:22
  • 4汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册(1999增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社175-180.
  • 5[美]菲尔德著,阳志平等译.工作评价:组织诊断与研究实用量表[M].中国轻工业出版社2004.
  • 6彭向刚.领导科学概论[M].高等教育出版社,2008.
  • 72007年、2008年、2009年北京市职工年平均工资公告.北京市统计局.
  • 8Lawler, E. J.; Y. Jeongkoo. Commitment in Exchange Relations:a test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion. American Sociological Review, 1996, (61).
  • 9Smith, J. N.; D. W. Barclay. The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1997, (61).
  • 10Rindfleisch, A.. Organizational Trust and Interfirm Cooperation:an Examination of Horizontal Versus Vertical Alliances. Marketing Letters, 2000, (90).

共引文献520

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部