结果的推迟发生与既遂结论的质疑

The Delayed Consequence of Cases and The Question of The Conclusion about Accomplished Offense

关于结果推迟发生的案件,主流的既遂结论在客观归责与故意归责上的论证并不充分。在客观归责领域,行为人的后一行为危险与前一行为危险应是独立关系,而非伴随关系。后一行为危险独立、直接地导致死亡结果,阻断并超越了前一行为危险。结果不能归责于前一行为。在故意归责领域,概括故意说、计划实现理论、事前计划学说、故意危险理论等存在的问题是,违反了行为与故意同时存在原则,混淆了计划实现与故意归责,忽视了故意行为危险与过失行为危险的差别。结果不能归责于前一行为故意。因此,对行为人不应以杀人既遂论处,而应以杀人未遂与过失致人死亡并罚。

Regarding the delayed consequence of cases,the arguments of the mainline conclusion about accomplished offense is inadequate in both objective imputation and intentional imputation.In the field of objective imputation,the relationship of the danger of doer' s latter behavior and his former behavior is independent rather than causal relationship.The danger of the latter results in death independently and directly,and not only blocks up but also surpasses the danger of the former.The former should not be responsible for the result.In the field of intentional imputation,the theories of general intention,plan implementation,pre-incident plan and prescribed danger have the following problems;violating the principle of the coexistence of behavior and intention;confusing plan implementation with intentional imputation;ignoring the difference between the danger of intentional behavior and that of negligent action.Consequence should not be imputed to the intention of the former behavior.Therefore,the doer should not be sentenced to offence of intentional killing,but rather an attempted murder and crime of negligent homicide.