期刊文献+

加工焦点性和任务负荷对不同认知方式大学生前瞻记忆的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of the Focality of Processing and Ongoing Task Load on Prospective Memory for Undergraduates with Different Cognitive Styles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用双任务范式,探讨了加工焦点性和进行中任务负荷对不同认知方式大学生前瞻记忆的影响。包括两个实验:实验一探讨进行中任务与前瞻记忆任务加工的焦点性和加工类型的一致性对不同认知方式大学生前瞻记忆的影响;实验二探讨进行中任务负荷对不同认知方式大学生在在焦点加工和非焦点加工条件下前瞻记忆的影响。结果显示:焦点加工条件下的前瞻记忆成绩高于非焦点加工,且不受进行中任务负荷的影响;不管进行中任务与前瞻记忆任务的加工类型是否一致,在进行中任务负荷较高且非焦点加工条件下,场独立大学生的前瞻记忆成绩高于场依存大学生。本研究结果支持多重加工理论。 The present study aimed to investigate how the focality of processing and ongoing task load affect the event-based prospective memory( EBPM) for undergraduates with different cognitive styles. This study contained two experiments. Experiment 1 examined the effect of the focality of processing and the matching in the types of processing between the prospective memory task and ongoing task on EBPM for field-independent( FI) and fielddependent( FD) undergraduates. Experiment 2 investigated how ongoing task load and the focality of processing affected the EBPM for FI and FD undergraduates. The results showed that,( 1) the performance in focal processing condition was better than that in nonfocal processing condition,which was not affected by the change of the ongoing task load;( 2) under conditions of high ongoing task load and nonfocal processing,the performance for FI undergraduates was significantly better than that for FD ones,which was not affected by the matching in the types of processing between the prospective memory task and ongoing task. The present study supports the multiprocess theory.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期149-157,共9页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然科学基金(31470973) 人类认知与行为发展山东省高校重点实验室与发展与教育心理学山东省重点学科资助
关键词 认知方式 焦点加工 进行中任务负荷 基于事件前瞻记忆 TAP效应 cognitive style focal processing ongoing task load event-based prospective memory TAP effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Abney, D. H. ,McBride, D. M. , & Petrella, S. N. (2013). Interac- tive effects in transfer-appropriate processing for evented-based pro- spective memory: The roles of efforts, ongoing task, and PM cue prop- erties. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1032 -1045.
  • 2Blowers, G. H. , & O' CONNOR, K. (1978). Relation of eye move- ments to errors on the rod-and-frame test. Perceptual and motor skills,46(3) , 719-725.
  • 3Brewer, G. A., Knight, J. B., Marsh, R. L., & Unsworth, N. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory & Cognition, 38(3) , 304 -311.
  • 4Cohen, A. L. , Jaudas, A. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & cogni- tion, 36(1) , 149 -156.
  • 5Cona, G., Bisiaeehi, P. S., & Moscovitch, M. (2013). The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory : insights from ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 24( 10), 2630 -2646.
  • 6Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. 5th ed. New York: happer and Row publishers, 206 -218.
  • 7Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Sci- ence, 14 (6), 286 - 290.
  • 8Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Mulitiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monito- ring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (3), 327 - 342.
  • 9Einstein, G. O. , McDaniel, M. A. , Williford, C. L. , Pagan, J. L. , & Dismukes, R. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situa- tions is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9 (3), 147 - 162.
  • 10Goode, P. E. , Goddard, P. H. , & Pascual-Leone, J. (2002). Event- related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial order recall task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 43 ( 2 ) , 123 - 140.

二级参考文献176

共引文献79

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部