摘要
目的探讨祛铁治疗对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后造血重建和相关并发症的影响。方法回顾性分析57例伴铁过载的allo-HSCT治疗的MDS患者的临床资料,根据血清铁蛋白(SF)水平分为有效祛铁组(移植前SF 〈1 000 μg/L)和铁过载组(移植前SF≥1 000 μg/L)。探讨有效祛铁治疗对移植后造血重建及相关并发症的影响。结果①57例患者中30例在移植前行祛铁治疗,27例未行祛铁治疗。30例行祛铁治疗的患者中19例(63%)归入有效祛铁组[移植前SF中位数为561(223-846)μg/L],11例归入铁过载组[移植前SF中位数为1 262 (1 100-2 352)μg/L]。27例未行祛铁治疗患者移植前SF中位数为1 540(1 320-3 112)μg/L,均归入铁过载组。②有效祛铁组、铁过载组分别有19例(100.0%)、34例(89.5%)获得干细胞完全植入,粒系重建时间分别为12(10-18) d、12(11-30) d(P=0.441),血小板重建时间分别为13(12-30) d、15(10-32) d(P= 0.579)。③有效祛铁组感染发生率低于铁过载组[36.8%(7/19)对82.4%(28/34),P=0.002]。④有效祛铁组急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)发生率低于铁过载组[26.3%(5/19)对64.7%(22/34),P=0.010]。有效祛铁组aGVHD均为Ⅰ/Ⅱ度,铁过载组Ⅰ/Ⅱ、Ⅲ/Ⅳ度患者分别为16、6例。⑤铁过载组6例患者移植后早期继续祛铁治疗,SF由2 870 (2 205-3 580)μg/L降至1 270 (1 020-1 650)μg/L,且耐受性良好。⑥有效祛铁组中位无病生存时间与铁过载组比较,差异无统计学意义[28.9 (0.3-89.5)个月对21.2(0.1-81.0)个月,χ2=3.751,P=0.053]。结论铁过载显著增加MDS患者移植相关并发症;移植前有效的祛铁治疗可明显降低移植后感染及aGVHD发生率和严重程度。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of iron chelation therapy on hematopoietic reconstitution and related complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).MethodsVarious clinical parameters were analyzed retrospectively in 57 MDS patients with iron overload who received allo-HSCT. According to the level of serum ferritin (SF) before transplantation divided patients into two groups: the effective treatment group (SF〈1 000 μg/L) and iron overload group (SF≥1 000 μg/L).Results①30/57 cases were received iron chelation treatment, 27/57 patients didn' t received iron chelating therapy before transplantation. 19/30 cases were in the effective treatment group, and the median SF level before transplantation was 561 (223-846) μg/L. 11/30 cases were in the iron overload group, and the median SF level before transplantation was 1 262 (1 100-2 352) μg/L. The median SF level was 1 540 (1 320-3 112) μg/L of 27 patients didn't received iron chelating therapy before transplantation. ② The rate of fully-engraftment in the effective treatment group and iron overload group was 19 cases (100.0% ) and 34 cases (89.5% ), myeloid reconstitution of 12(10-18) and 12(11-30) days respectively (P=0.441), and platelet reconstitution of 13(12-30) and 15 (10-32) days respectively (P=0.579). ③The infection risk rate of the effective treatment group was less than iron overload group [36.8% (7/19) vs 82.4% (28/34), P=0.002]. ④The incidence of aGVHD in effective treatment group was less than iron overload group [26.3%(5/19) vs 64.7%(22/34), P= 0.010]. All patients of the effective treatment group were Ⅰ/Ⅱ degree. 16 cases were Ⅰ/Ⅱ degree and 6 cases were Ⅲ/Ⅳ degree in the iron overload group. ⑤ 6 cases of iron overload group accepted iron chelation treatment early post-transplantation, and SF level decreased from 2 870 (2 205-3 580) μg/L to 1 270 (1 020-1 650) μg/L. ⑥The difference of median disease-free survival time between the effective treatment group and iron overload group was not statistically significant [28.9 (0.3-89.5) months vs 21.2(0.1-81.0) months, χ2=3.751, P=0.053].ConclusionsIron overload obviously increased transplant-related complications, and effective iron chelation therapy before transplantation significantly decreased the incidence of infection and degree of aGVHD, thereby reduced the non-relapse mortality in patients with MDS.
出处
《中华血液学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第3期189-193,共5页
Chinese Journal of Hematology
基金
国家临床重点专科建设项目
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目
江苏省临床医学中心(ZX201102)
江苏省科技厅生命健康科技专项(BL2012005)
关键词
铁过载
骨髓增生异常综合征
造血干细胞移植
Iron overload
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation