期刊文献+

基于复相关-灰色关联分析的高校科技创新能力指标体系的构建 被引量:11

Establishment of Index System for Universities Scientific and Technology Innovation Ability Based on Multiple Correlation- Grey Relational Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建的指标体系是否具有合理性直接影响着后续评价结果的准确性。立足于高校科技创新过程与区域创新系统分析角度,通过指标定性与定量筛选方法相结合,构建高校科技创新能力评指标体系。运用复相关系数分析剔除易被其他指标替代的指标,避免指标间信息重叠;通过灰色关联分析剔除对评价目标不重要的指标,保留对评价结果影响显著的指标。计算灰色关联分析中的分辨系数值,提高灰色关联度的准确度。以我国31个省级行政区为样本,最终构建包含27个指标的基于区域视角的高校科技创新能力评价指标体系。最终筛选出的指标集保留了90.7%的原始指标集信息。 The validity of index system directly affects the accuracy of the evaluation results. Based on the process of sci- entific innovation and regional innovation system, this paper establishes an original index system for scientific and technolo- gy innovation ability of university with qualitative and quantitive screening methods. The conclusions lie on the following as- pects. First, the multiple correlation method is used to delete the indicator which reflects repetitive information with other indicators. The gray correlation method is used to delete the indicator which is easily replaced by others, and it guarantees that the screened indicators have significant effect on results. Second, the distinguishing coefficient was calculated which improves the accuracy of gray correlation method. Third, the index system for the university scientific and technology inno- vation ability is established with 31 provinces, which contains 27 indicators. Fourth, the example shows that eventual index system contains 90. 7% information content of original index system.
作者 程鹤 陈树文
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期117-123,共7页 Science and Technology Management Research
关键词 高校 科技创新能力 指标体系 筛选方法 universities scientitic and technology innovation ability index system screening methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1HENKEL M. The modernization of research evaluation: the case of the UK [J]. Higher Education, 1999 (1): 105-122.
  • 2AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL. Excellence in research for Australia2012 [EB/OL]. (2013-01 -03) [2013-12-20]. http: //www. arc. gov. au/pdf/era12/report_ 2012/ARC_ ERA12_ Introduction. pdf.
  • 3BENO1T M. International rankings: universities vs. higher educalion systems [ J ]. International Journal of Educational Development, 2014, 12 (4): 127-129.
  • 4刘毳.中英高等教育评估项目比较[J].高教发展与评估,2011,27(5):26-29. 被引量:3
  • 5武书连,吕嘉,郭石林.2010中国大学评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(4):5-13. 被引量:125
  • 6刘文达,邰忠智,李光泽.浅谈高校科研评估体系的构建[J].科技管理研究,1999,19(1):16-18. 被引量:18
  • 7SUTHATHIP Y. YING CHU NG. The impact of higher education re- form on research performance of Chinese universities [ J ]. China E- conomic Review, 2014, 12 (31) : 94 - 105.
  • 8GiNOVANNI A, TINDARO CICERO, CIRIACO ANDREA D AN- GELO. The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall nni-versity research performance [ J]. Journal of Informetfics, 2013,01 (7): 166-175.
  • 9施星国,张建华,仲伟俊.区域高校科技创新能力的评价研究[J].研究与发展管理,2009,21(4):106-113. 被引量:36
  • 10TINA B, IAN P, ANNE G. Effective university industry interac- tion : a muhi - case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects [ J ]. European Management Journal, 2002 (20) : 272 -285.

二级参考文献57

共引文献412

同被引文献100

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部