期刊文献+

美国赡养立法研究

A Study of Filial Support Legislation in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国子女赡养立法历史悠久,其立法结构较为完整,赡养诉讼主体资格范围较广,且有一套完善的法律救济机制,但由于联邦制度的局限性,各州赡养立法之间存在较大的差异性,一定程度上加大了法律实施的成本,加之美国政府及州政府对老年人的各种资金补助计划的实施,这些因素妨碍了赡养立法作用的发挥。然而,美国子女赡养法中某些制度设计,对我国赡养立法的完善还是具有可资借鉴的地方,我国立法可以在扩大赡养诉讼主体资格范围、完善法律援助机制以及加大对于不尽赡养义务的子女的法律惩戒力度等方面进行改革与创新。 Filial support legislation in the USA has a long history. It has complete legislative structure,and its scope of subjects of litigation related to filial support is wider.In addition,it has a set of more perfect system of legal remedy. But because of the limitation of federal system,there exist differences between the filial support laws from different states. And to some extent that enhances the cost of law enforcement. Meanwhile,federal government and state government in the USA have different kinds of fund support plans. The factors above interfere with the role of filial support laws. But the designs of some systems against filial support in the US.may help our filial support law improve further.Our filial support law would reform and initiate based on the following aspects,such as qualification on the subjects of legislation,improvement of system of legal aids and imposing heavier legal liabilities on those that do not maintain indigent parents.
作者 谭和平
出处 《湘南学院学报》 2016年第1期22-27,共6页 Journal of Xiangnan University
关键词 赡养立法 赡养责任 赡养救济 filial support legislation filial support liabilities legal remedies of filial support
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Pearson, K. C. Filial Support Laws in the Modern Era:Domestic and International Comparison of EnforcementPractices for Laws Requiring Adult Children to SupportIndigent Parents [J]. The Elder Law Journal,2013,20(2).
  • 2Edelstone S. F. Filial Responsibility: Can the Legal Duty toSupport Our Parents Be Effectively Enforced- [J]. FamilyLaw Quarterly, 2002, 36(3):501-514.
  • 3Giacomo A. M. A comparative analysis of FilialResponsibility: Italy and United States [M]. 8-9.
  • 4Moskowitz S. Adult Children and Indigent Parents:Intergenerational Responsibilities in InternationalPerspective [J]. Marquette Law Review,2002,86(3).
  • 5Moskowitz S. Filial Responsibility Statutes: Legal andPolicy Considerations [J]. J. L. &POL'Y, 2001(9):723.
  • 6Art L. Singapore's Maintenance of Parents Act:A Lesson toBe Learned from the United States [J]. Loy. L. A. Int'1&Comp. L. Rev,1995(17).
  • 7孙佑海.对修改后的《民事诉讼法》中公益诉讼制度的理解[J].法学杂志,2012,33(12):89-93. 被引量:56
  • 8杨翠迎,马涛.子女赡养责任政策与立法的国际比较及对中国的启示[J].社会保障研究,2014(5):81-88. 被引量:6
  • 9黄益助.法律援助主体问题研究[J].浙江万里学院学报,2005,18(6):65-67. 被引量:2

二级参考文献15

  • 1孟双见,吴海涛.日本人口老龄化对日本社会经济的影响[J].日本问题研究,2005,19(4):26-29. 被引量:10
  • 2[英]伊丽莎白·A·马丁.牛津法律词典[M].蒋一平,译.上海:上海翻译出版社,1991,340.
  • 3Jacob.“Americasagingpopulation”.http://www.prb.org/pdf11/aging-in-america.2013-06-27.
  • 4日本国立社会保障与人口问题研究所相关数据,http://www.ipss.go.jp,2010-0.
  • 5UnitedNations.WorldPopulationProspects,The2008Revision.NewYork,2009:48-52,184.
  • 6鲁恩艾尔维克等.《挪威和英国的积极养老观念与政策》,北京,法律出版社,2007.
  • 7翟芳.《老年人精神赡养的法律问题研究》,55-65页,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2012.
  • 8凌寒之.《韩国赡养老人可获买房优惠并可获得优先购房权》,http://tj.house.sina.com.cn/n/2006-09-15/112541203.html.
  • 9EUROPEAN COMMISSION,The2009AgeingReport:UnderlyingAssumptionsandProjectionMethodologies,p.19.http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication_summary14911_en.htm,2014年4月30日访问.
  • 10马歇尔·卡特,等.《信守诺言--美国养老社会保障制度改革思路》,李珍等译,北京,中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部