地奥司明片联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗Ⅲ_B型前列腺炎的临床研究

Effect of Drip Irrigation Amount on Water Consumption Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transformation of Summer Soybean in North Xinjiang

目的：观察并评估地奥司明片联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗Ⅲ_B型前列腺炎的临床疗效及用药安全。方法：将162例Ⅲ_B型前列腺炎患者随机分成对照组和观察组两组,对照组患者予以盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗,观察组予以地奥司明片联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗,治疗前及治疗后2个月分别对所有患者进行美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数评分（NIH-CPSI）,包括疼痛不适评分、排尿症状评分以及生活质量评分,比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应的发生情况。结果：对照组及观察组患者经过治疗以后NIH-CPSI评分结果均较治疗前明显改善,其差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;其中观察组的总体显效率及总体有效率均较对照组显著升高（P〈0.05）,而不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：地奥司明片联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗Ⅲ_B型前列腺炎较坦索罗辛单药治疗效果更为显著,能显著提高临床疗效,改善患者生活质量,而不显著增加不良反应的发生率,具有很大的临床推广及应用价值。

The field experiment was conducted by setting four drip irrigation treatments including 3 000 ma/ hm2 （W1）,3 600 ma/hm2 （W2）,4 200 m3/hm2 （W3） and 4 800 m3/hm2 （W4） to study the effects of different drip irrigation on water consumption characteristics, dry matter accumulation and transformation of summer soybean following randomized block design. The results showed that with the increase of drip irrigation quantities, the water content in 0-60 cm soil laye increased greatly at each growth stage of summer soy- bean, and the differences of soil moisture in 0 40 cm soil layer was more obviously, but little difference was observed in 40 60 cm soil layer. However, stored soil water consumption decreased while the total water consumption increased. The dry matter accumulation showed the S-shaped curve; treatment Wa had the best of the continued days of dry matter rapid accumulation（At）, the maximum increase rate of dry matter（V,,,） and the total dry matter accumulation. Results from correlation and regression analysis methods indicated that there were positive correlations between yield and dry matter translocation before and after anthesis, especially the dry matter translocation after anthesis had the significant contribution to yield, in addition, all of the dry matter translocation after anthesis, its ration and contribution to grains decreased in the order： W3 〉W4）We〉Wl. The treatment W3 had the highest yield of 3 741.23 kg/hme, which was 30.42%0,13.98% and 8. 44%higher than the other treatmensts, respectively, reaching the significant difference level （p〈0.05）. Water use efficiency decreasd in the order： W3 〉W4 〉W2 〉W1, the irrigation water use efficiency had no significant difference between treatment W1, We and W3, but all of them were higher than treatment W4.