期刊文献+

战略性新兴产业集群演进路径研究--以河南省为例 被引量:8

Research on the Evolution Path of the Strategic Emerging Industry Cluster——A Case Study on Henan Province's Development Situation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年河南省出台的战略性新兴产业发展规划指出,集群发展是河南省战略性新兴产业发展的有力支撑。战略性新兴产业集群具有集聚性、网络化、创新性等基本特征,可以使用产业集群度作为衡量和判断战略性新兴产业集群发展阶段的指标,河南省战略性新兴产业集群演进分为五个阶段,并具有各自的发展特征。当前河南省应从产业集聚区的科学规划、产业政策、龙头企业培育、服务体系建设等方面着手,以产业集聚区作为战略性新兴产业集群发展的载体;要针对战略性新兴产业集群演进的不同阶段制定适应性政策,如完善风险投资机制、拓宽投融资渠道、引进和培养高层次创新型人才等,推动河南省战略性新兴产业集群发展。 In 2012, strategic emerging industry development plan of Henan province pointed out that the cluster development was a strong support for the development of strategic emerging industries in Henan province. Strategic emerging industry cluster has the basic characteristics of clustering, networking, innovation and so on. It can be used as an indicator of the development stage of strategic emerging industry clusters, and the evolution of strategic emerging industrial clusters in Henan province is divided into five stages, and has the characteristics of their respective development. At present, Henan province should take the industrial cluster as the carrier of the development of strategic emerging industrial clusters with the scientific planning, industrial policy, the cultivation of leading enterprises, service system construction and so on. In order to develop the strategic emerging industry cluster, we should set the adaptive policies, such as improving the venture capital mechanism, expanding investment and financing channels, introducing and cultivating high-level innovative talents, etc.
作者 刘大勇
出处 《区域经济评论》 2016年第1期89-94,共6页 Regional Economic Review
基金 河南省政府决策研究招标课题“河南省培育壮大战略性新兴产业发展研究”(2014129)
关键词 战略性新兴产业 产业集群 演进路径 Strategic Emerging Industry Industry Cluster Evolution Path
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

  • 1李新春.专业镇与企业创新网络[J].广东社会科学,2000(6):29-33. 被引量:40
  • 2贺灿飞,梁进社,张华.区域制造业集群的辨识——以北京市制造业为例[J].地理科学,2005,25(5):521-528. 被引量:28
  • 3向晓梅.地区战略产业特征与形成机理[J].广东社会科学,2006(5):28-32. 被引量:18
  • 4薛俊波,王铮.中国17部门资本存量的核算研究[J].统计研究,2007,24(7):49-54. 被引量:138
  • 5Chenery H.B., Robinson S., Syrquin M., 1986, Industrialization and Growth: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, pp48--52.
  • 6Fagerberg Jan, 2000, “Technological Progress, Structural Change and Productivity Growth: A Comparative Study”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 393--411.
  • 7Krugman P., 1994, “The Myth of Asia's Miracle: A Cautionary Fable”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.73, pp.62--78.
  • 8Peneder Michael, 2003, "Industrial Structure and Aggregate Growth", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 14, pp.427--448.
  • 9Syrquin, M., 1984, "Resource allocation and productivity growth", In: Syrquin, M. ,Taylor, L., Westphal, L.E. (Eds.), Economic Structure Performance Essays in Honor of Hollis B. Chenery, Academic Press, pp75--101.
  • 10Timmer P. M., Szirmai A., 2000, “Productivity Growth in Asian Manufacturing: the Structural Bonus Hypothesis Examined”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 371--392.

共引文献1009

同被引文献83

引证文献8

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部