期刊文献+

低R.E.N.A.L评分肾肿瘤行腹腔镜肾部分切除术中肾动脉无阻断的有效性和安全性分析 被引量:4

Renal artery clamping versus non-clamping laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal mass of low R.E.N.A.L score
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较肾动脉阻断与不阻断下行腹腔镜肾部分切除术对于治疗低R.E.N.A.L评分肾肿瘤的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2013年6月~2014年3月我院同一名医师完成的腹腔镜肾部分切除术73例临床资料,R.E.N.A.L评分均≤6,其中肾动脉阻断组54例,肾动脉无阻断组19例。比较两组患者一般资料、围手术期及手术前后肾功能变化等指标。结果:手术均顺利完成,无中转开放。阻断组术中肾动脉阻断时间为(18.5±8.5)min。阻断组较无阻断组手术时间长(130.1±20.5vs.104.2±13.6min)、术中失血少(153.3±56.6vs.223.4±92.7ml),差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组间输血率、切缘阳性率、术后并发症发生率及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组间术后1周血肌酐变化值的差异无统计学意义(15.3±4.1vs.14.3±4.2μmol·L-1,P〉0.05),术后1个月阻断组患肾GFR较后者差(40.1±5.6vs.44.2±7.2ml·min-1),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组间术后1年患肾GFR的差异无统计学意义(46.5±5.7vs.47.0±7.1ml·min-1,P〉0.05)。术后随访16个月,无复发病例。结论:对于R.E.N.A.L评分≤6分肾肿瘤行腹腔镜肾部分切除术,阻断肾动脉可减少术中出血且不增加切缘阳性率。阻断和无阻断肾动脉对短期肾功能的影响有差别,而对长期肾功能的影响无差别。 Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between renal artery clamping and non-clamping laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal mass with low R. E, N. A. L score. Method: A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 73 patients with renal mass of low R. E. N. A. L score who underwent laparoscopic partial ne- phrectomy by a same urologist from Jun. 2013 to Mar. 2014 was performed. Fifty-four patients underwent surgeries with renal artery clamping, and 19 patients underwent surgeries without renal artery clamping. Patients de- mographics, tumour characteristics, perioperative outcomes and renal function before and after operation were compared. Result.. All operations were performed successfully without conversion. The median clamping time was (18.5±8.5) rain in clamped group. In clamped group, operation time was longer than that in unclamped group (130.1±20.5 vs. 104.2±13.6 rain, P 〈0.05), and blood loss was less than that in undamped group (153.3± 56.6 vs. 223.4±92.7 ml, P 〉0.05). Blood transfusion rate, positive surgical margins, postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay were similar between two groups ( P 〉0.05). The difference of the change of serum ereatinine were not significant between two groups (15.3±4.1 vs. 14.3±4.2 μmol . L-1 , P 〉0.05). In clamped group, the GFR one month postoperatively was poorer than that in unclamped group (40.1 ±5.6 vs. 44.2±7.2 ml .min-1 , P 〈0.05). GFR one year postoperatively were similar between two groups (46.5±5.7 vs. 47.0±7.1 ml . min-1, P 〉0.05). Median follow-up was sixteen months and no recurrence occurred. Conclu- sion: Renal artery clamping laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with low R. E. N. A. L score has less blood loss without increasing positive surgical margin. that in clamped group, but the difference of long-term Short-term renal function in unclamped group is better than renal function isn't significant between two groups.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2016年第2期120-122,126,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 腹腔镜肾部分切除术 R.E.N.A.L评分 阻断 肾功能 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy R. E. N. A. L score clamping renal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张雪培,王耀锋,魏金星,王智勇,王声政,蔡腾,王刘中.腹腔镜与开放行肾部分切除术的临床疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2011,26(4):298-300. 被引量:16
  • 2Guillonneau B, Bermudez H, Gholami S, et al. Lapa- roscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature[J].J Urol, 2003, 169(2): 483--486.
  • 3Thompson R H, Lane B R, Lohse C M, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partialnephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 340 --345.
  • 4邢力永,刘春雨,汤洋,韩瑞发,刘利维.后腹腔镜肾动脉高选择性阻断与全阻断肾部分切除术疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2014,29(5):383-385. 被引量:6
  • 5黄建生,杨江根.腹腔镜肾部分切除术中肾低温保护现状[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2011,26(2):150-152. 被引量:9
  • 6Gill I S, Eisenberg M S, Aron M, et al. "Zero ische- mia" partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and ro- botic technique[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 59(1).. 128-- 134.
  • 7Smith G L, Kenney P A, Lee Y, et al. Non-clamped partial nephreetomy: techniques and surgical outcomes[J]. BJUInt, 2011, 107(7): 1054--1058.
  • 8George A K, Herati A S, Srinivasan A K, et al. Perio- perative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(4b).. E235--E241.
  • 9Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial ne- phrectomy using renal scintigraphy., clamped vs clamplesstechnique[J]. BJU Int, 2015, 115(4)~ 606 --612.
  • 10董隽,高江平,徐阿祥,王威,郭刚,朱捷,宋勇,蔡伟,郝通利,洪宝发.不阻断或短时间阻断肾动脉行腹腔镜保留肾单位手术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1186-1188. 被引量:8

二级参考文献54

  • 1张旭,李宏召,马鑫,郑涛,徐晓峰,郭小林,陈忠,王少刚,叶章群.后腹腔镜保留肾脏手术治疗肾肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):160-162. 被引量:71
  • 2吕文成,郝钢跃,李军,肖荆,苏大军,杜林栋.腹腔镜肾部分切除术(附15例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(2):108-110. 被引量:15
  • 3张旭,李宏召.腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术治疗肾肿瘤现状[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):437-438. 被引量:36
  • 4[1]Moinzadeh A,Gill IS,Finelli A,et al.Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy:3-year follow up.J Urol,2006,175:459-462.
  • 5[4]Lightfoot N,Conlon M,Kreiger N,et al.Impact of noninvasive imaging on increased incidental detection of renal cell carcinoma.Eur Urol,2000,37:521-527.
  • 6[5]Fergany AF,Hafez KS,Norick AC.Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma:10-year followup.J Urol,2000,163:442-445.
  • 7[6]Herr HW.Partial nephrectomy for unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney:10-year followup.J Urol,1999,161:33-34.
  • 8[7]McDougall EM,Clayman RV,Chandhoke PS,et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model.J Urol,1993,149:1633.
  • 9[8]Frank I,Colombo JR,Rubinstein M,et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for centrally located renal tumors.J Urol,2006,175(3):849-852.
  • 10[9]Janetschek G,Abdelmaksoud A,Bagheri F,et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia:renal artery perfusion.J Urol,2004,171:68-71.

共引文献45

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部