期刊文献+

北京地区成人危急值界限值分布情况的调查研究 被引量:5

Investigation on the distribution of critical value limits in adult patients in Beijing
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查北京地区成人危急值界限值的分布情况,为制定区域性《检验危急值规范化管理技术指南》提供依据,从而推进检验危急值精准管理。方法收集北京地区2015年1月1日至5月31日期间三级及以上医疗机构检验科临检血液、临床生化、凝血、血气项目的出现危急值的病例记录共110398条,将各危急值项目按患者就诊科室、主要诊断作为筛选条件,采用Kruskal—Walis检验,两两比较各组差异性。再将合并后通用组按性别作为筛选条件,采用Mann—Whithey U检验,比较各组的差异性,最终确定危急值分层界限值。结果除ca上限、Glu下限、pCO2上限、pH上下限、Hb上限外,其余各危急值项目均因患者就诊科室/主诊断不同及或性别不同而使危急值界限值差异有统计学意义。结论根据不同就诊科室/疾病类型、性别制定了对各危急值项目的分层界限值。 Objective To investigate the distribution of critical values of adults in Beijing, to provide the evidence for the formulation of the Standardized Management Guideline in Critical Values, in order to promote the accurate management of critical values. Methods A total of 110 398 data of critical values from the tertiary and above medical institutions during January 1 to May 31 in 2015 in Beijing were collected by the way of on-site inspection, covering the disciplines of hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation and blood gas analysis. Fristly, the selected critical values were classified by the factor of admission departments and disease types, then were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis test, to compare the differences in each group. Secondly, the combined groups were classified by the factor of gender then were analyzed by using Mann-Whithey U test, to compare the differences in each group. Finally, the stratification thresholds of critical values were established. Results Except for the upper limits of Ca, pH, pCO2, Hb and the lower limits of Glu, pH, the rest of thresholds of critical values had significant differences due to different admission departments and disease types and/or gender. Conclusion Depending on the different admission departmentsces disease types and/or gender, hierarchical limit values on each critical value were formulated.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期181-186,共6页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家临床重点专科建设项目 北京医院协会研究项目
关键词 血液学试验 临床化学试验 血液凝固试验 血气分析 试验预期值 Hematologic tests Clinical chemistry tests Blood coagulation tests Blood gas analysis Predictive value of tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values [ J ] Med Lab Observer, 1972,4( 1 ) :47-54.
  • 2Dighe AS, Jones JB, Parham S, et al. Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false-positive critical value results [ J ]Arch Pathol Lab Med , 2008, 132(10) : 1666-1671. DOI: 10. 1043 / 1543-2165(2008) 132 [1666:SOCVIRA] 2.0. CO;2.
  • 3Piva E, Plebani M. From " panic" to "critical" values: which path toward harmonizaticn? [ J ]. Clin Chem 1,ab Med , 2013,51 (11): 2069 -2071 . DOI:10.1515/cclm-2013-0459.
  • 4检验危急值在急危重病临床应用的专家共识组.检验危急值在急危重病临床应用的专家共识(成人)[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2013,22(10):1084-1089. 被引量:96
  • 5Emancipator K. Critical values: ASCP praetice pararneler. American Society of Clinical Pathologists[ J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 1997, 108(3) : 247-253.
  • 6Howanitz P], Steindel SJ, Heard NV. LaboraoT critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q- Probes Study in 623 institutions [ J ]. Areh Patbol Lab Med, 2002,126 ( 6 ) : 663 -669. DOI : 10. 1043 / 0003 -9985 ( 2002 ) 126 <0663 :LCVPAP >2.0. CO;2.
  • 7Wagar EA, Friedberg RC, Souers R, et al. Critical values comparison : a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes sm'vey of 163 clinical laboratories[ J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2007, 131 (12) : 1769-1775. DOI: 10. 1043/ 1543-2165 ( 2007 ) 131 [ 1769 : CVCACO ] 2.0. CO ;2.
  • 8World Health Organization. 2008 field review of patient safety so]utionsR, http// www. who. int/ patientsafety/ solutions/ patientsafety/2008-field- review/en/. [ 2009-01 --181.
  • 9Chinese Hospital Association, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100013, PRC.CHA2007年患者安全目标暨主要措施[J].中国医院,2007,11(1):29-30. 被引量:56
  • 10曾蓉,王薇,王治国.临床实验室危急值报告制度的建立[J].中华检验医学杂志,2012,35(4):380-381. 被引量:49

二级参考文献35

  • 1张真路,刘泽金,赵耿生,杨军,王文武,崔敏.临床实验室危急值的建立与应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):452-453. 被引量:149
  • 2Wagar EA, Stankovic AK, Wilkinson DS, et al. Assessment monitoring of laboratory critical values: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study of 180 institutions [ J. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2007, 131 (1) : 44-49.
  • 3Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values [ R ]. MLD MedLabObs, 1972, 4 (1): 47-54.
  • 4Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, et al. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center [ J ]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006, 125 (5) : 758-764.
  • 5Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs : regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) -HCFA: final rule with comment period [ J]. Fed Regist, 1992, 57 (40) : 7002-7186.
  • 6The Joint commission. Accreditation Program: Laboratory, National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG. 02. 03. 01 ) [ R]. http: // www. jointcommission, org/Accessed [2010-07-12].
  • 7College of American Pathologists. Laboratory General Checklist [components GEN. 41320, GEN. 41330, and GEN. 41340] [R]. http: //www. cap. org [2010-08-26].
  • 8International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189: 2007: Medical Laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence [ R ]. Geneva, Switzerland : International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
  • 9World Health Organizatinn. 2008 field review of patient safety solutions [ R ]. http : //www. who. int/patientsafety/solutions/ patientsafety/2008-field-review/en [ 2009-01-18 ].
  • 10Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Heafthcare organizations: National Patient Safety Goals [ R ]. http: //www. jcahoorg/ aceredited+ organizations/patient + safety/npsg, htm [ 2005-08- 22].

共引文献178

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部